US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 4, § 4.11.6.1
Referral Process to CMS
Compliance is promoted through both administrative and formal legal actions.
Administrative compliance action shall first be attempted by MACs through education
and warning letters that request the provider to comply with Medicare’s rules and
regulations. If the provider fails to take corrective action and continues to remain non-compliant, the MAC shall make a referral to the UPIC who shall forward it to the BFL,
with a copy to the COR.
It is important for MACs to promote program compliance in their respective
jurisdictions. The MACs shall ensure that all materials presented to providers through
education, published bulletins, or written communication are clear and concise and
accurately represent the facts of compliance versus non-compliance. Providers shall also
be allowed the opportunity to present additional facts that may represent mitigating
circumstances.
UPICs shall consider this information in an objective manner before proceeding with a
CMP referral to CMS.
When a UPIC elects to make a CMP referral to CMS, the initial referral package shall
consist of a brief overview of the case; supportive documentation is not required at such
time. The initial referral package shall consist of:
1. Identification of the provider, including the provider’s name, address, date
of birth, Social Security number, Medicare identification number(s), and
medical specialty. If the provider is an entity, include the names of its
applicable owners, officers, and directors.
2. Identification of the CMP authorities to be considered (use the authorities
identified in PIM Chapter 4, §4.11.5).
3. Identification of any applicable Medicare manual provisions.
4. A brief description of how the violations identified above were discovered,
and the volume of violations identified.
5. Total overpayments due the program or the beneficiary(ies), respectively.
6. A brief chronological listing of events depicting communication (oral and
written) between the MAC and the provider.
7. A brief chronological listing of bulletins addressing the non-compliant area
(starting with the bulletin released immediately prior to the first incident of
non- compliance by the provider).
8. Any additional information that may be of value to support the referral.
9. The name and phone number of contacts at the UPIC.
Upon receipt of the above information, CMS staff will review the materials and may
conduct follow-up discussions with the UPIC regarding the referral. Typically, within 90
days of receipt of the referral, CMS will notify the UPIC of its decision to accept or
decline the referral.
If CMS declines the referral, the UPIC shall communicate this to the MAC to continue
in their efforts to educate and promote compliance by the provider. The UPIC shall also
consider other (less severe) administrative remedies, which, at a minimum, may include
revocation of assignment privileges, establishing prepayment or postpayment medical
reviews, and referral of situations to state licensing boards or medical/professional
societies, where applicable. In all situations where inappropriate Medicare payments
have been identified, MACs shall initiate the appropriate steps for recovery.
If CMS accepts the referral, the UPIC shall provide any supportive documentation that
may be requested, and be able to clarify any issues regarding the data in the case file or
UPIC and MAC processes.
History
(Rev. 11962; Issued: 04-21-23; Effective: 05-22-23; Implementation: 05-22-23)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
4d274e50bda1ca9c14166cd3c6d59f9777127155705f416eade6deb383886f45
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.