Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 4, § 4.11.6.1

Referral Process to CMS

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

Compliance is promoted through both administrative and formal legal actions.

Administrative compliance action shall first be attempted by MACs through education

and warning letters that request the provider to comply with Medicare’s rules and

regulations. If the provider fails to take corrective action and continues to remain non-compliant, the MAC shall make a referral to the UPIC who shall forward it to the BFL,

with a copy to the COR.

It is important for MACs to promote program compliance in their respective

jurisdictions. The MACs shall ensure that all materials presented to providers through

education, published bulletins, or written communication are clear and concise and

accurately represent the facts of compliance versus non-compliance. Providers shall also

be allowed the opportunity to present additional facts that may represent mitigating

circumstances.

UPICs shall consider this information in an objective manner before proceeding with a

CMP referral to CMS.

When a UPIC elects to make a CMP referral to CMS, the initial referral package shall

consist of a brief overview of the case; supportive documentation is not required at such

time. The initial referral package shall consist of:

1. Identification of the provider, including the provider’s name, address, date

of birth, Social Security number, Medicare identification number(s), and

medical specialty. If the provider is an entity, include the names of its

applicable owners, officers, and directors.

2. Identification of the CMP authorities to be considered (use the authorities

identified in PIM Chapter 4, §4.11.5).

3. Identification of any applicable Medicare manual provisions.

4. A brief description of how the violations identified above were discovered,

and the volume of violations identified.

5. Total overpayments due the program or the beneficiary(ies), respectively.

6. A brief chronological listing of events depicting communication (oral and

written) between the MAC and the provider.

7. A brief chronological listing of bulletins addressing the non-compliant area

(starting with the bulletin released immediately prior to the first incident of

non- compliance by the provider).

8. Any additional information that may be of value to support the referral.

9. The name and phone number of contacts at the UPIC.

Upon receipt of the above information, CMS staff will review the materials and may

conduct follow-up discussions with the UPIC regarding the referral. Typically, within 90

days of receipt of the referral, CMS will notify the UPIC of its decision to accept or

decline the referral.

If CMS declines the referral, the UPIC shall communicate this to the MAC to continue

in their efforts to educate and promote compliance by the provider. The UPIC shall also

consider other (less severe) administrative remedies, which, at a minimum, may include

revocation of assignment privileges, establishing prepayment or postpayment medical

reviews, and referral of situations to state licensing boards or medical/professional

societies, where applicable. In all situations where inappropriate Medicare payments

have been identified, MACs shall initiate the appropriate steps for recovery.

If CMS accepts the referral, the UPIC shall provide any supportive documentation that

may be requested, and be able to clarify any issues regarding the data in the case file or

UPIC and MAC processes.

History

(Rev. 11962; Issued: 04-21-23; Effective: 05-22-23; Implementation: 05-22-23)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
4d274e50bda1ca9c14166cd3c6d59f9777127155705f416eade6deb383886f45
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.