Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 4, § 4.10.2.3

Contents of Sanction Recommendation

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

The UPIC shall include in the sanction recommendation (to the extent appropriate) the

following information:

• Identification of the subject, including the subject's name, address, date of birth,

social security number, and a brief description of the subject's special field of

medicine. If the subject is an institution or corporation, include a brief description

of the type of services it provides and the names of its officers and directors.

• A brief description of how the violation was discovered.

• A description of the subject's fraudulent or abusive practices and the type of

health service(s) involved.

• A case-by-case written evaluation of the care provided, prepared by the UPIC’s,

or MAC’s MR staff, which includes the patient's medical records. This

evaluation shall cite what care was provided and why such care was unnecessary

and/or of poor quality. (The reviewer may want to consult with someone from

their RO CCSQ.) Medicare reimbursement rules shall not be the basis for a

determination that the care was not medically necessary. The reviewer shall

identify the specific date, place, circumstance, and any other relevant

information. If possible, the reviewer should review the medical records of the

care provided to the patient before and after the care being questioned.

NOTE: A minimum of 10 examples shall be submitted in support of a sanction

recommendation under §1128(b)(6)(B). In addition, none of the services being used to

support the sanction recommendations shall be over 2 years old.

• Documentation supporting the case referral, e.g., records reviewed, copies of any

letters or reports of contact showing efforts to educate the provider, profiles of

the provider who is being recommended for sanction, and relevant information

provided by other program administrative entities.

• Copies of written correspondence and written summaries of the meetings held

with the provider regarding the violation.

• Copies of all notices to the party.

• Information on the amount billed and paid to the provider for the 2 years prior to

the referral.

• Data on program monies on an assigned/non-assigned basis for the last 2 years, if

available.

• Any additional information that may be of value in supporting the proposal to

exclude or that would support the action in the event of a hearing.

NOTE: All documents and medical records should be legible.

History

(Rev. 11032; Issued: 09-30-21; Effective: 10-12-21; Implementation: 11-10-21)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
c49f7aebb43c1a7360cd3f5a1e3faeeb4dcaa7af5287e2c7ea0184913f385673
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.