US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 3, § 3.9.2
Coordination of the ALJ Hearing
As needed, if multiple entities are participating in a hearing as a party, participant, or
witness, the QIC will set up a brief pre-hearing conference call to discuss the respective
entity’s participation in the case, roles and responsibilities, etc. Examples in which this
may be necessary include high dollar cases, extrapolated overpayments, policy
implications, and/or fraud related cases, etc.
Pre-hearing briefing topics may include: coordination with OMHA on scheduling
matters, the manner of participation, coordination on position papers or other written
testimony submitted, and lessons learned from participation in the ALJ process.
There may be cases in which testimony from another contractor is necessary. The
contractor may call those entities as a witness only if the contractor has declared party
status. However, if the contractor submits a position paper as a participant, the contractor
may collaborate with other contractors and document their views on the case in the
paper—although only one contractor may typically participate via the hearing.
The contractor shall establish a single point of contact for ALJ offices on administrative
matters involving notifications, scheduling, information sharing, and other coordination
necessary between the ALJ, the appellant, and other contractors.
History
(Rev. 748, Issued: 10-13-17; Effective: 11-14-17; Implementation: 11-14-17)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
8827379e2a53209195a082fba5c9914a23174125ebbbf505952b62083c062423
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.