Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 3, § 3.6.2.4

Coding Determinations

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

This section applies to MACs, CERT, SMRC, Recovery Auditors, and

UPICs, as indicated.

ICD-10-CM is used for diagnoses on inpatient discharges and for other services provided

on and after the implementation of ICD-10-CM.. ICD-9-CM is used for discharges and

other services before that date.

The MACs, CERT, SMRC, Recovery Auditors, and UPICs shall determine that an

item/service is correctly coded when it meets all the coding guidelines listed in the

Current Procedural Terminology-4 (CPT-4), Coding Clinic for ICD, Coding Clinic for

HCPCS, and any coding requirements listed in CMS manuals or MAC articles.

In certain situations, it is appropriate for contractors to up code or down code a claim (or

items or services on a claim) and adjust the payment. When the medical record supports a

higher or lower level code, the MACs, SMRC, CERT, UPICs and Recovery Auditors

shall not deny the entire claim but instead shall adjust the code and adjust the payment.

The MACs, SMRC, CERT, UPICs and Recovery Auditors shall up code or down code

when it is possible to pay for the item or service actually provided without making a

reasonable and necessary determination or if otherwise specified in applicable CMS

medical review instructions. The MACs, SMRC, CERT, UPICs and Recovery Auditors

shall not substitute the payment amount of one item or service for a different item or

service based on a reasonable and necessary determination.

Example situations where it is appropriate to up code or down code a claim

are:

1. CBC with diff was ordered and billed but CBC without diff was

provided;

2. X-ray with contrast was ordered and billed but X-ray without

contrast was provided;

3. E&M level 3 was billed but the medical record supports level 2 (or

other level);

4. PPS (DRG/RUG/HHRG) code was billed but the medical records

supports a different code; and

5. Quantity of diabetic test strips exceeds limits; for example, quantity

was provided for insulin treated but the patient was not insulin

treated.

History

(Rev. 10365; Issued: 10-02-20; Effective: 08-27-20; Implementation: 08-27-20)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
8190035aab9347513b04c5a4886a8c865cbeef7e9a33274d74c95b1221016087
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.