US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-08, ch. 2, § 2.4
Sources of Data for MACs and UPICs
A. Contractors To Which This Section Applies
This section applies to MACs and UPICs. The sources of data for CERT and Recovery
Auditors are specified in their SOWs.
B. General
The data sources that MACs and UPICs use will depend upon the issue(s) being
addressed and the availability of existing data. CMS maintains numerous systems
housing Medicare, Parts A, B, and D claims, Beneficiary Entitlement, Enrollment and
Utilization data, Provider reference information. The IDR is the enterprise resource
designed to house and unify the data from disparate systems to enable cross-cutting
reporting and analysis. The IDR has been created with an aim toward reducing data
redundancy, providing flexibility to satisfy changing business needs and serve as the
relational data warehouse for core CMS data. The IDR provides the system platform and
database structures which enable one store of data to meet the various needs of our MAC
and UPIC community. The repository is leveraged by multiple reporting, analytical and
operational production applications.
Systematic data analysis requires MACs and UPICs to have in place the hardware and
software capability to profile providers in aggregate, by provider type, by common
specialties among providers, or individually. Some of the provider information that
should be used includes:
• Types of providers;
• Volume of business;
• Volume (or percentage) of Medicare/Medicaid patients;
• Prevalent types of services;
• Location;
• Relationships to other organizations;
• Types of ownership;
• Previous investigations by the UPIC;
• Size and composition of staff;
• Administrative costs;
• Claims history; and
• Other information needed to explain or clarify the issue(s) in question.
Where possible, the selection of providers should show a representative grouping, in
order to accurately reflect the extent of program losses.
C. Primary Source of Data
Claims data is the primary source of information used to identify and target fraudulent,
wasteful or abusive activities. Sources of claims data are:
• IDR--MACs and UPICs should utilize the reports accessible in the
system platform and database structures. Reports include the
following:
o Claims Summary Information report (CSI) which used to be called
Health Care Information System (HCIS),
o Part B Analytics System Report (PBASR), which show
comparative utilization ratios by code, MAC, and specialty,
o Short Term Alternatives for Therapy Services (STATS) which
shows Outpatient therapy professional and provider claims data,
o IDR Analysis Reports which include analysis reports and IDR volume
and statistics, and
o Focused Medical Review (FMR) which shows Part B claims
utilization and enrollment data.
The MACs and UPICs shall also use national data where available. National data for
services billed by skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and home health agencies (HHAs) is
available at the CMS Data Center. When made available, contractors can access through
CMS One Program Integrity (see below One PI) or the CMS Enterprise Portal.
• CMS One Program Integrity (One PI) – Serves as a system application, tool
and databases providing access to the CMS IDR;
• Contractor Local Claims Data – Local data should be compiled in a way to
identify which providers or type of service in the contractor’s area may be
driving any unusual utilization patterns;
• CMS Fraud Prevention System(FPS) --When access is available, MACs
should consider periodically reviewing the information and data trends
resulting from national predictive models contained in the FPS;
• CMS PBASR--The Report stores data sets that contain annual timeframes, and
Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System HCPCs/CPT codes that
correspond to provider/supplier disciplines. Each data set displays the allowed
services, allowed charges, and payment amounts by HCPCs/CPT codes and
prominent modifiers. The PBAR is only accessible through the Enterprise
Portal; and
• CMS Claims Summary Information (CSI)—–Files contain Medicare Part A
(i.e., Inpatient, Skilled Nursing Facility, Home Health Agency (Part A & B)
and Hospice) and Medicare Part B (i.e., Outpatient) information based on the
type and State of the institutional provider. The data set names correspond with
the provider type. Brief descriptions of the provider types and the selected
reporting elements (e.g., units of service, billed charges, provider ZIP code,
etc.) are provided. Access is through the One PI portal.
D. Secondary Sources of Data
The MACs and UPICs should consider other sources of data in determining areas for
further analysis. These include:
• OIG and Government Accountability Office (GAO) reports;
• Fraud Alerts;
• Beneficiary, physician and provider complaints;
• Appeals data from QICs, including appeals overturn rate for a particular type
of claim;
• Referrals from the QIO, other contractors, CMS components, Medicaid
fraud control units, Office of the U.S. Attorney, or other federal programs;
• Suggestions provided directly or implicit in various reports and other materials
produced in the course of evaluation and audit activities, (e.g., contractor
evaluations, State assessment, CMS-directed studies, contractor or State audits
of providers);
• Referrals from medical licensing boards;
• Referrals from the CAC;
• Peer Review Reports such as the First -look Analysis Tool for Hospital
Outlier Monitoring (FATHOM) and Program to Evaluate Payment Patterns
Electronic Report (PEPPER), and Comparative Billing Reports;
• Information on new technologies and new or clarified benefits;
• Provider cost reports;
• Provider Statistical and Reimbursement (PS&R) System data;
• Enrollment data;
• Overpayment data;
• Pricing, data analysis, and coding (PDAC) data;
• Referrals from other internal and/or external sources (e.g., MAC audit staff,
audit staff or, MAC quality assurance (QA) staff);
• Medicare Learning Network – which includes MedLearn Matters articles
and Quarterly Provider Compliance Newsletters;
• IBM Cognos support for the Part D and Drug Data Processing System
(DDPS) using the Teradata data repository;
• CMS prepared data, such as a listing of distinct providers or suppliers and/or
bills that require medical review.
While the MAC, Recovery Auditor, and UPIC should investigate reports from the GAO,
congressional committees, Office of Inspector General Office of Audit Services (OIG
OAS), OIG OI, newspaper and magazine articles, as well as local and national television
and radio programs, highlighting areas of possible abuse, these types of leads should not
be used as a main source for leads on fraud, waste or abuse cases.
History
(Rev. 12772; Issued: 08-09-24; Effective: 09-20-24; Implementation: 09-20-24)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
100688865c51dd0dac4a7b1f062f9fa1ffb6c98ea863a3706e5d295a0d3fc48d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.