US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-06, ch. 8, § 40
Planning and Management (Global Scoping)-Field and In-House
Audits
(Rev. 107, Issued: 09-22-06; Effective: 10-01-06; Implementation: 10-02-06)
The audit work plan and selection process is influenced by the budgetary restrictions
imposed upon you by CMS. Annually, through the budget process and the Budget
Performance Requirements (BPRs), CMS gives you guidance for managing audit
resources in terms of areas of concentration and dollars available to accomplish the tasks.
Develop an audit plan to identify cost reports to be audited and resources to be expended,
taking into consideration the guidance that CMS gives you in §40.1 of this chapter and
the BPRs about the types of providers or potential issues to be audited. However, do not
use these priorities as the sole determining factor in the planning process. The planning
process is based on your empirical knowledge, past performance of the provider, last time
audited, and the relative risk associated with the settlement amount calculated from the
cost report. Generally, select providers for audit that based on your professional
judgment, represent the greatest risk for incorrect payment.
Effective management of audit resources requires a continual decision-making process.
As events occur throughout the audit cycle and circumstances come to light, the audit
plan must be continually evaluated and priorities reassessed. If a greater audit
requirement becomes evident, do not defer that audit work. Rather, defer or cancel audit
work of lesser urgency. If there is no work of lesser urgency, seek guidance from the
RO.
Apply the appropriate level of resources for each audit to assure that payments made to a
provider are not more or less than required under applicable law and regulations to
achieve CMS's audit objectives. If you are unable to meet both the quantity and quality
standards, seek guidance from your regional office (RO) on the extent to which you may
deviate from your budget/plan while maintaining audit quality.
You are expected to accomplish the goals outlined in the BPRs to the extent that other
audit needs that are discovered during the year do not outweigh these goals. Use
professional judgment to communicate workload adjustment needs to your RO. Monitor
your progress on BPRs and discuss the impact of any problems that may develop in
meeting the BPRs with your RO.
History
(Rev. 107, Issued: 09-22-06; Effective: 10-01-06; Implementation: 10-02-06)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
37acc7aed0840ad2714e75710b641e2e58d5feff137fae30c62f4f6388e58232
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.