US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-06, ch. 3, § 70.3
1870 Determination – Waiver of Recovery of an Overpayment
Once the contractor has concluded that an overpayment exists (that is, a finding that payment cannot be
made under the waiver of liability provisions) it makes a §1870(b) determination regarding whether the
provider/beneficiary was without fault with respect to the overpayment. Once this determination has
been made, then waiver of recovery of the overpayment from the provider/beneficiary should be
considered per §1870(c).
The contractors make a §1870 determination for all assigned and non-assigned claims, however, §1870
(b) or (c) of the Act, does not apply to the provider on non-assigned post-payment §1862(a)(1) denied
claims. However, it can apply to the beneficiary meaning that the beneficiary was not at fault in causing
the overpayment. The provider may have a refund obligation to the beneficiary, but the provider did not
receive an overpayment from the Medicare program.
Section 1870 is not limited to claims denied under §1862(a)(1) of the Act for not being reasonable and
necessary. Section 1870 is the framework for determining who is liable for the overpayment and
whether the overpayment recovery can be waived. For providers taking assignment, waiving recovery of
an overpayment is appropriate where the provider was without fault with respect to causing the
overpayment. Where recovery from the provider is waived per 1870(c), the overpayment becomes an
overpayment to the beneficiary. However, if the provider was “at fault” in causing the overpayment,
recovery of the overpayment from the provider must proceed. Section 1870 waiver of recovery
determinations also must be made where the provider mistakenly receives direct payment on an
unassigned claim and this is the basis for the overpayment.
Examples of §1870 determinations:
A. Overpaid Provider or Physician Not Liable Because It Was Without Fault (§1870(b) of the
Act.)
If a provider was without fault with respect to an overpayment it received (or is deemed without fault, in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, because the overpayment was discovered subsequent to the fifth
calendar year after the year of payment) it is not liable for the overpayment; therefore, it is not
responsible for refunding the amount involved. The contractor makes these determinations.
B. Beneficiary Liable for Overpayments to Provider That Was Without Fault With Respect to the
Overpayment (§§1870(a) and (b) of the Act)
If an overpaid provider was without fault, or is deemed without fault and therefore not liable for refund,
liability shifts to the beneficiary. If the overpayment involves services that are not reasonable and
necessary, you should have made a §1879 determination regarding the beneficiary’s liability for the
overpayment. If the overpayment does not involve medically unnecessary services, then limitation on
liability does not apply.
C. Contractor Waiver of Recovery from Beneficiary (§1870(c) of the Act)
If a beneficiary is liable for an incorrect payment, recovery may be waived if the beneficiary was
without fault with respect to the overpayment and recovery would defeat the purposes of title II or title
XVIII of the Social Security Act (i.e., cause financial hardship) or would be against equity and good
conscience. (Where an overpayment is discovered subsequent to the fifth calendar year after the year the
payment was made, recovery is deemed against equity and good conscience if the beneficiary was
without fault.)
If §1879 of the Act is applicable, then §1879 determination is made first since an overpayment does not
exist if payment can be made under §1879 because there was lack of knowledge by both the beneficiary
and the provider.
History
(Rev. 294, Issued: 10-06-17, Effective: 07-03-17, Implementation: 07-03-17)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
7ffc72aebdd12e83fa253f2aef91ee7d4acdf106e062aa18d2e70c8ca3c14a8b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.