US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-06, ch. 3, § 200.5
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Third Level and Subsequent
Level of Appeals
(Rev. 12509; Isuued:02-15-24; Effective: 07-01-24; Implementation: 07-01-24)
Whether or not the provider subsequently appeals the overpayment to the ALJ,
Departmental of Appeals Board (DAB), or Federal court, contractors shall continue to
recoup until the debt is satisfied in full. Recoupment remains in effect as provided in
CFR 42 §405.373 (e). Refer to Publication 100-04, Medicare Claims Processing Manual,
Chapter 29 §330-330.2. If an overpayment determination subject to the limitation
on recoupment under 42 CFR §§ 405.379 and 405.378 is reversed in whole or in part on
funds recouped (excluding voluntary payments, ERS collections, and immediate
recoupments requested by the provider or supplier prior to the Qualified Independent
Contractor decision), the 935 interest shall be paid to the provider or supplier.
A. Glossary:
Reversal - Although appeals in the administrative appeals process are de novo
proceedings (i.e., a new determination/decision is made at each level), Medicare uses
this term when the new determination/ decision is more favorable to the appellant than
the prior determination/ decision, even if some aspects of the prior
determination/decision remain the same.
Decisions and Determinations - If a Medicare appeal request does not result in a
dismissal, adjudication of the appeal results in either a “determination” or “decision.”
There is no apparent practical distinction between these two terms although applicable
regulations use the terms in distinct contexts. A decision that is reopened and
thereafter revised is called a “Revised determination.”
Effectuate - This means for the MAC to issue a payment or change liability.
Affirmation - A term used to denote that a prior claims determination has been upheld
by the current claims adjudicator. Although appeals through the OMHA level are de
novo, CMS and its contractors often use this term when an adjudicator reaches the same
conclusion as that in the prior determination, even though he/she is not bound by the
prior determination.
Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals (OMHA) - The Office of Medicare
Hearings and Appeals is responsible for level 3 of the Medicare claims appeal process
and certain Medicare entitlement appeals and Part B premium appeals. At level 3 of the
appeals process, an appellant may have a hearing before an OMHA ALJ, or review by
an attorney adjudicator.
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) - Adjudicator employed by the Department of Health
& Human Services (HHS), Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals (OMHA) that holds
hearings and issues decisions related to level 3 of the appeals process.
Department of Appeals Board (DAB) Review - The DAB provides an impartial,
independent review of disputed decisions in a wide range of Department of Health and
Human Services programs under more than 60 statutory provisions.
Appeals Council - The Medicare Appeals Council (herein Appeals Council), a division
within the Departmental Appeals Board provides the final level of administrative review
of claims for entitlement to Medicare and individual claims for Medicare coverage and
payment.
Remand - An action taken by an adjudicator to vacate a lower-level appeal decision, or
a portion of the decision, and return the case, or a portion of the case, to that level for a
new decision.
Note: For additional information go to Publication 100.04, Medicare Claims
Processing Manual Chapter 29 - Appeals of Claims Decisions
History
(Rev. 12509; Isuued:02-15-24; Effective: 07-01-24; Implementation: 07-01-24)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
abc2d8528107baa3c9f30616ef17f2a2615a3735ed92082562baff9a41b8940e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.