Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-06, ch. 3, § 140.2.5

Recoupment and Set-off (see also §140.6.4)

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

Recoupment and set-off are two of Medicare's primary tools for recovering overpayments from debtor

providers, but these terms may be used differently in other federal contexts, including under the Federal

Claims Collection Act. In bankruptcy, jurisdictions vary in their decisions about how Medicare can use

these tools. Some jurisdictions consider the Medicare Part A provider agreement one

contract/transaction and allow it to be the basis for broad powers of recoupment. Other jurisdictions

consider each cost report year as a distinct contract and restrict recoupment to periods within a particular

cost report year. The CMS Office/CMS Counsel can advise the Contractor whether current law in a

specified jurisdiction permits recoupment.

1. Recoupment

Recoupment permits a party to reduce current payments to account for prior overpayments made under

the same contract or transaction. Recoupment permits adjustment across the petition date and does not

require approval of the bankruptcy court. Therefore, Medicare should recoup in any jurisdiction where it

is permitted.

2. Set-off

If recoupment is not permitted, set-off will be considered. Medicare must take quick action to recover

overpayments using set-off. Set-off should not take place without specific instructions by the CMS

Office or CMS Counsel.

Set-off permits making similar adjustments in situations involving one or more contracts or transactions.

For example, suppose B owes A $40.00 under one contract and A owes B $50.00 under another

contract. If set-off is allowed, then A can take her $40 from the $50 she is holding for B (A would only

pay B $10.00). Generally, parties can request court permission to set-off. If allowed, parties can set-off

pre-petition claims against pre-petition payments or post-petition claims against post-petition payments.

They cannot set-off pre-petition claims against

post-petition claims.

3. Administrative Freeze

Once it is discovered that a provider is in bankruptcy, Medicare can enact a temporary administrative

freeze. An administrative freeze (sometimes called a Strumpf freeze, named after a Supreme Court case)

will allow time for Medicare to determine if there are any overpayments and to ask the bankruptcy court

to allow set-off. Speed is essential because courts do not permit set-off across the petition date. A pre-petition overpayment can only be set-off against a pre-petition claim.

History

(Rev. 13825; Issued: 06-11-26; Effective: 07-13-26; Implementation: 07-13-26)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
10487a99e07db6e2c1330cd52c07f3c0f1bcddab71c542a3dbb87d879f2f9307
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.