Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-06, ch. 3, § 130.1

Impact of Change of Ownership and Assignment of Medicare Provider

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

Agreement on Overpayments and Underpayments

(Rev. 13235; Issued: 05-22-25; Effective: 06-23-25; Implementation: 06-23-25)

Assignment of Medicare Provider Agreement:

When an existing provider agreement is assigned to a new owner, the new owner is subject to all of the

applicable statutes and regulations, terms and conditions under which the existing agreement was issued.

One of these statutes requires the adjustment of ongoing payments to the provider to account for prior

overpayments and underpayments. Under a CHOW, there is no change in the provider agreement; only

the owner has changed. Therefore, when a new owner accepts assignment of the Medicare provider

agreement, the Contractor continues to adjust any payments it makes to the provider.

A. The Contractor Collects All Overpayments from the New Owner

In a CHOW, the new owner that receives automatic assignment of the Medicare provider agreement

also accepts responsibility for any overpayments that Medicare made to the old provider, whether those

overpayments are currently outstanding or are determined after the CHOW. This rule applies even if the

overpayments relate to a cost report or other time periods before the CHOW. Therefore, after the

contractor receives the tie-in notice from CMS or the State Survey Agency (SA) confirming that CMS

or the SA has approved the CHOW, the Contractor contacts only the new/current owner to collect any

overpayments. It pursues all collection remedies against the new/current owner via (1) recoupment; (2)

offset against Medicaid payments; (3) correspondence to the new/current owner; or (4) referral to the

United States Department of the Treasury (Treasury).

B. The Contractors Recoup funds first on any outstanding Overpayments from any

Underpayments before releasing the excess amounts back to the new provider.

After a CHOW, the Contractor issues any provider underpayments to the new owner, even if the

underpayment relates to cost years or other periods before the CHOW. Such underpayments include,

but are not limited to, underpayments which result from reimbursement appeals (regardless of whether

they result from administrative or court decisions, from administrative resolutions or from court

settlements). Contractors verify if there are any underpayments. If so, the Contractors shall recoup funds

and apply to outstanding overpayments from any underpayments that are determined for the provider and

refund any excess amounts.

C. Sales/Transfer Agreements between Owners are not Binding in Medicare Program

If the new owner does not reject automatic assignment of the previous owner’s Medicare provider

agreement, the assignment will occur automatically, consistent with Medicare regulations. Therefore,

the Contractor shall recover overpayments from the new/current owner, regardless of the terms of any

sales or other transfer agreement.

D. Overpayments Related to Fraud

A new owner that accepts assignment of the prior owner’s Medicare provider agreement is responsible

for any overpayments, regardless of the basis for the determination of the overpayment unless the

overpayment is under fraud investigation. In the case where the previous owner was under a fraud

investigation the assignment of the overpayment would not pass to the new owner.

History

(Rev. 13235; Issued: 05-22-25; Effective: 06-23-25; Implementation: 06-23-25)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
2e07be1736d8740504d73ac0acab5a430e36395c852766c9214084079ba187a3
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.