US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-05, ch. 2, § 80.5
Permissible Distinctions in Coverage Allowed a GHP or LGHP
A plan is not prohibited from limiting covered utilization of a particular service as long as
the limitation applies uniformly to all plan enrollees. For instance, if a plan limits its
coverage of renal dialysis sessions to 30 per year for all plan enrollees, the plan would
not be differentiating in the benefits it provides between plan enrollees who have ESRD
and those who do not.
If a GHP or LGHP makes benefit distinctions between various categories of individuals
(distinctions unrelated to the fact that an individual is entitled to Medicare but based, for
instance, on length of time employed, occupation, or marital status), the GHP or LGHP
plan may make the same distinctions between the same categories of individuals entitled
to Medicare whose plan coverage is based on current employment status. For example, if
a GHP or LGHP does not offer coverage to employees who have worked less than one
year and who are not entitled to Medicare on the basis of disability or age, the GHP or
LGHP is not required to offer coverage to employees who have worked less than one
year and who are entitled to Medicare on the basis of disability or age.
• A GHP or LGHP may pay benefits secondary to Medicare for an aged or disabled
beneficiary who has current employment status if the employer employs fewer than 20 or
100 employees, respectively.
• A GHP or LGHP may pay benefits secondary to Medicare for an aged or disabled
beneficiary who has current employment status if the plan coverage is COBRA
continuation coverage because of reduced hours of work. Medicare is primary payer for
this beneficiary because, although he/she has current employment status, the GHP or
LGHP coverage is by reason of the COBRA law rather than by virtue of current
employment status.
• A GHP may terminate COBRA continuation coverage of an individual who
becomes entitled to Medicare on the basis of ESRD when permitted under the COBRA
provisions. The only exception in the COBRA law (see 29 U.S.C.1162(2)(D)(ii))
prohibits GHPs from terminating COBRA coverage for retirees and dependents who are
entitled to Medicare when the employee retired before the employer effectively
terminated the regular plan coverage by filing for bankruptcy.
History
(Rev. 11755, Issued:12-21-2022, Effective: 01-23-2023, Implementation: 01-23-23)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
7bb039fc42f9d91fd58907c6427291c019a8d13adf0d58e20c78e06a0823bed4
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.