US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 34, § 10.13
System and Processing Requirements for Use of Secure Internet
Portal/Application to Support Reopening Activities
(Rev. 2241; Issued: 06-17-11, Effective: 10-01-11, Implementation: 10-03-11)
Contractors who develop and utilize a secure Internet portal/application for reopening
purposes shall ensure, at a minimum:
• CMS approves (i.e., Contract Manager or Project Officer, if applicable, and
Appeals Business Function Lead) the proposed portal/application and usage prior
to development and implementation.
• The portal/application fully complies and has been tested to ensure compliance
with all CMS system security requirements regarding protected health
information prior to implementation/usage.
• The secure Internet portal/application includes a formal registration process that
validates the signature. This process shall include, at a minimum, use of restricted
user identifiers (IDs) and passwords. Contractors shall include an indication
and/or description of the validation methodology in the appeals case file should an
appeal on the item/service reopened be requested.
• Templates for submission of electronic reopening request shall include, at a
minimum, a method for authenticating that the party has completed the
portal/application registration process and has been properly identified by the
system as an appropriate user.
• Contractors utilizing an approved portal/application shall provide education to
parties to the reopening regarding system capabilities/limitations prior to
implementation and utilization of the secure portal/application.
• Contractors shall also educate parties to the reopening that
participation/enrollment in the secure portal/application is at the discretion of the
party and the party bears the responsibility for the authenticity of the information
being attested to.
• Appropriate procedures are in place to provide parties with confirmation of
receipt of the reopening request via secure Internet/portal and verbiage instructing
the parties not to submit additional reopening requests for the same item or
service via different venue (hard copy mail or telephone).
• Contractors utilizing a secure portal/application shall ensure that there is a process
in place by which a party can submit additional documentation/materials
concurrent with the reopening request. The portal/application shall have the
capability to accept additional documentation and/or other materials to support
reopening requests.
• Refusal to reopen and adverse revised determination notices transmitted via a
secure Internet portal/application shall comply with the timeliness and content
requirements as outlined in the Pub. 100-04, chapter 34. In addition, contractors
shall provide hard copy decision notices to parties to the reopening, as required,
who do not have access to the secure Internet portal/application. The notices must
be mailed and/or otherwise transmitted concurrently (i.e., mailed on the same day
the notice is transmitted via the secure portal/application).
• Contractors utilizing a secure Internet portal/application shall include the adverse
revised determination/decision notice and any other related materials in the
appeals case file if a valid appeal on the item/service is later requested.
• Contractors shall also ensure that parties may save and print the revised adverse
determination/decision notice or refusal to reopen notice and that the secure
portal/application includes a mechanism by which the date/time of the notification
is tracked/marked both in the system and on any printed decision notices so as to
adequately inform the party of timeframes for ensuring timely submission of
future appeal requests.
History
(Rev. 2241; Issued: 06-17-11, Effective: 10-01-11, Implementation: 10-03-11)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
de27d4bcb4bf8af9c43115f98448289a54da7f55b25145e6d56ae6ee0756529a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.