Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 33, § 10.7.2

Jurisdiction to Complete the Penalty Waiver Determination

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

The entity with the authority to impose the penalty that is the subject of the provider or

supplier’s request for a §903(c) penalty waiver determination has the jurisdiction to

complete such determination (regardless of whether it has jurisdiction to determine if the

guidance was erroneous). If the contractor does not possess such authority, then it does

not have jurisdiction to complete the §903(c) penalty waiver determination unless a

specific delegation of authority is issued to the contractor by the contractor’s project

officer or other competent CMS authority, which authorizes the contractor to complete

such determination. Absent such delegation, the contractor must refer the provider or

supplier’s request to the entity that possesses such authority.

See §10.3 regarding whether a matter is properly considered a §903(c) penalty under this

section. See also §10.4 regarding whether the matter has been delegated to the

contractor. If the matter raised by the provider or supplier is outside the scope of matters

discussed in the foregoing specified subsections, then the contractor to which a §903(c)

request has been made will decline jurisdiction absent a specific grant of jurisdiction on

such matter and will refer the matter to the contractor’s RO or project officer, as

appropriate.

History

(Rev. 739, Issued: 11-01-05, Effective: 07-24-03, Implementation: 01-19-06)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
ff06b2614fb73ece2ee5084a8b2abee5766a533e531df220e659413adb801975
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.