US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 33, § 10.7.2
Jurisdiction to Complete the Penalty Waiver Determination
The entity with the authority to impose the penalty that is the subject of the provider or
supplier’s request for a §903(c) penalty waiver determination has the jurisdiction to
complete such determination (regardless of whether it has jurisdiction to determine if the
guidance was erroneous). If the contractor does not possess such authority, then it does
not have jurisdiction to complete the §903(c) penalty waiver determination unless a
specific delegation of authority is issued to the contractor by the contractor’s project
officer or other competent CMS authority, which authorizes the contractor to complete
such determination. Absent such delegation, the contractor must refer the provider or
supplier’s request to the entity that possesses such authority.
See §10.3 regarding whether a matter is properly considered a §903(c) penalty under this
section. See also §10.4 regarding whether the matter has been delegated to the
contractor. If the matter raised by the provider or supplier is outside the scope of matters
discussed in the foregoing specified subsections, then the contractor to which a §903(c)
request has been made will decline jurisdiction absent a specific grant of jurisdiction on
such matter and will refer the matter to the contractor’s RO or project officer, as
appropriate.
History
(Rev. 739, Issued: 11-01-05, Effective: 07-24-03, Implementation: 01-19-06)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
ff06b2614fb73ece2ee5084a8b2abee5766a533e531df220e659413adb801975
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.