US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 33, § 10.2.1
Guidance Was Erroneous
The first condition that must be met is that the Medicare program guidance must have
been erroneous. The analysis of whether the guidance was erroneous must consider two
standards and both standards must be met to conclude that the guidance was erroneous
for the purpose of invoking the provisions of this section.
The first standard is that the guidance was, in fact, erroneous at the time of the provider
or supplier’s act or omission that is the basis for the penalty at issue. If there was no error
in the guidance then a waiver of the penalty may not be granted.
The second standard is that the error must be material. That is, the error must be the
necessary cause of the provider or supplier’s act or omission that is the basis for the
penalty at issue. If the error is one that would not have caused a reasonable, similarly
situated provider or supplier to act or to refrain from acting in the manner that is the basis
of the penalty, then the contractor must conclude that a §903(c)-type error is not present
and must, therefore, conclude further that a penalty waiver under §903(c) may not be
granted.
History
(Rev. 739, Issued: 11-01-05, Effective: 07-24-03, Implementation: 01-19-06)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
ba5ae50803e08c2c7b89f09bea7c75e0441a7dd564bdfaef628ee87d0515f675
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.