US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 32, § 400.2.5
Billing Information for Professional Claims
Professional claims for CAR T-cell therapy and related services are billed using the Form CMS-1500 or 837P following
instructions in chapter 12 of this manual (www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/104_claims/clm104index.asp).
Contractors shall pay professional claims for CAR T-cell therapy when the service is administered at a healthcare
facility that is enrolled in the REMS program as a REMS participating site. Contractors shall use the CMS HCPCS
Website for current HCPCS codes, https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/HCPCSReleaseCodeSets/HCPCS-Quarterly-Update, and the individual REMS facility websites noted at section 400.1.
Contractors shall create an edit that only allows CAR T-cell therapy services to be submitted by, or performed in, an
FDA REMS approved facility when the line item has a -KX modifier appended. Note: When a provider submits a -KX
modifier on CAR T-cell therapy services, they are acknowledging that the service is being submitted by or performed in
an FDA REMS approved facility.
Contractors shall create an edit that only allows CAR T-cell therapy services when the line item has a -LU modifier
appended in addition to a -KX modifier. Note: When a provider submits an -LU modifier on a CAR T-cell claim, it
informs the MAC that the service is fractionated. The total units shall not exceed 1 unit.
Contractors shall set up their systems to allow fractionated units on multiple claims for CAR T-cell products on the same
DOS. These claims should suspend for proper adjudication of payment.
The total payment will be divided by 10 and the provider will need to bill in 0.1 unit fractions. The provider will need to
bill a total of 10 fractional units to reach the total Medicare allowed payment amount.
Example: CAR T-cell product allowed payment $445,000:
0.2 units = $89,000.06
0.2 units = $89,000.00
0.2 units = $88,999.99
0.2 units = $88,999.98
0.2 units = $88,999.97
Note: Contractors shall only pay up to 1 unit, anything exceeding 1 unit must be denied.
For CAR T-cell products when the dose exceeds the code descriptor, use HCPCS code J3490, J3590, or J9999 for the
exceeded dosage. Include the CAR T-cell product name and the exceeded dosage in Block 19 of the 1500 claim form or
its electronic equivalent.
Example: CAR T-cell product with dose exceeded allowed payment $150,000:
0.5 units = $74,999.00
0.5 units = $75,001.00
For CAR T-cell products when the dose exceeds the code descriptor, the provider would bill a total of 1 unit of the Q
code plus a total of 1 unit of the J code.
For example, Q2041 Axicabtagene ciloleucel, up to 200 million autologous anti-CD19 CAR positive T- cells. If the
provider gives 300 million cells, they will bill:
Q2041 for 0.1 fraction $42,294.00 x10 for 200 million cells (total $422,940.00)
J9999 for 0.2 fractions $42,294.00 x5 for 100 million cells (total $211,470.00)
NOTE: The FDA labels for CAR T-cell products state the maximum number of cells that are to be infused. The HCPCS
code descriptors for Q2041, Q2042, Q2053, Q2054, Q2055, and Q2056 all align with the FDA label maximum number
of cells that are to be infused. If a provider exceeds the HCPCS code descriptor number of cells, this is off label use.
This should be extremely rare.
Contractors shall allow a -76 modifier (repeat procedure or service by same physician or other qualified healthcare
professional) on subsequent claims billed on the same date of service to assist with preventing duplicate denials.
History
(Rev. 11721; Issued: 11-28-22; Effective: 01-01-23; Implementation: 01-03-23)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
8ce67f18423bd4c4aee7bf65e7818aab3252eb6a4b806873282a9ee58930a950
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.