US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 32, § 350.4
Coverage Requirements for Emergency Hospital Services Furnished Outside of the
United States
(Rev. 3287, Issued: 06-30-15, Effective: 04-21-15, Implementation: 04-21-15)
The following requirements must be met for payment to be made for emergency services received by Medicare
beneficiaries in foreign hospitals:
• The hospital must meet the definition of an emergency hospital and be licensed or approved by the appropriate
agency of the country in which it is located.
• The services meet the criteria of emergency services.
The foreign hospital must be closer to or substantially more accessible from the site of the emergency than the nearest
U.S. hospital that was adequately equipped and available to treat the illness or injury.
1. Emergency Occurred in the U.S. (See §350.1.B for definition of the U.S.)
If the individual was physically present in the U.S. at the time the emergency occurred, the individual's reason for
departure from the U.S. must have been specifically to obtain treatment at the foreign hospital. Services are not covered
where the person's departure from the U.S. is part of a trip abroad and the foreign hospital is more accessible simply
because the individual was in the process of travel. For example, the airplane on which the individual was traveling
could not readily return to permit the person's removal.
2. Emergency Occurred in Canada
If the emergency occurred in Canada, the beneficiary must have been traveling, without unreasonable delay, by the most
direct route between Alaska and another state. Benefits are not payable if the emergency occurred while a beneficiary
was vacationing. The requirement of travel without unreasonable delay by the most direct route will be considered met
if the emergency occurred while the beneficiary was enroute between Alaska and another state by the shortest
practicable route, or while making a necessary stopover in connection with such travel.
NOTE: An emergency occurring within the Canadian inland waterway between the States of Washington and Alaska is
considered to have occurred in Canada.
Ordinarily, the "shortest practicable route" is the one that results in the least amount of travel in Canada, consistent with
the mode of travel used between the point of entry into Canada and the intended point of departure. The amount of
travel in the U.S., prior to entering Canada is not pertinent. A route involving greater travel within Canada may be
considered the "shortest practicable route" if the additional travel resulted in a saving of time or was necessary because
of such factors as:
• Road or weather conditions;
• The age of the traveler;
• Health, or physical condition of the traveler;
• The need to make suitable travel arrangements; or
• The need to obtain acceptable accommodations.
However, the individual would be considered to have deviated from the "shortest practicable route" if the detour was
unrelated to the purpose of reaching their destination (e.g., for the principal purpose of sightseeing or vacationing).
The term "necessary stopover" means a routine stopover for rest, food, or servicing of the vehicle, and a non-routine
stopover (even though of significant duration) caused by such factors as unsuitable road or weather conditions, the
age, health, or physical condition of the traveler, the need to make suitable travel arrangements, or to obtain
acceptable accommodations.
History
(Rev. 3287, Issued: 06-30-15, Effective: 04-21-15, Implementation: 04-21-15)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
1b60ca1cdc4e471a4f8834ec654a303881628a042848259df815adf2f5f2ffff
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.