US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 30, § 50.8.1
Options for Delivery Other than In-Person
ABNs should be delivered in- person and prior to the delivery of medical care which is
presumed to be non- covered. In circumstances when in -person delivery is not possible,
notifiers may deliver an ABN using another method. Examples include:
• Direct telephone contact;
• Mail;
• Secure fax machine; or
• Internet e-mail.
All methods of delivery require adherence to all statutory privacy requirements under
HIPAA. The notifier must receive a response from the beneficiary or his/her
representative in order to validate delivery.
When delivery is not in-person, the notifier must verify that contact was made in his/her
records. In order to be considered effective, the beneficiary should not dispute such
contact. Telephone contacts should be followed immediately by either a hand-delivered,
mailed, emailed, or a faxed notice. The beneficiary should sign and retain the notice and
send a copy of this signed notice to the notifier for retention in the patient’s record.
The notifier must keep a copy of the unsigned notice on file while awaiting receipt of the
signed notice. If the beneficiary does not return a signed copy, the notifier should
document the initial contact and subsequent attempts to obtain a signature in appropriate
records or on the notice itself.
History
(Rev. 10862; Issued: 07-14-21; Effective: 10-14-21; Implementation: 10-14-21)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
86309a3013cbc7aa3c53e92a774cb9c1828164ee9e314af9c9cf59803904de65
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.