US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 30, § 200.3.7
IM Delivery to Representatives
The IM may be delivered to a beneficiary’s appointed or authorized representative.
Types of Representative
Appointed Representative Authorized Representative
Appointed representatives are individuals
designated by beneficiaries to act on their
behalf. A beneficiary may designate an
appointed representative via the
“Appointment of Representative” form, the
CMS-1696. See Chapter 29 of the Medicare
Claims Processing Manual, section 270.1,
for more information on appointed
representatives.
An authorized representative is an
individual who, under State or other
applicable law, may make health care
decisions on a beneficiary’s behalf (e.g.,
the beneficiary’s legal guardian, or
someone appointed in accordance with
a properly executed durable medical
power of attorney).
Notes:
• However, if a beneficiary is temporarily incapacitated and there is no
representative, a person (typically, a family member or close friend) whom the
hospital has determined could reasonably represent the beneficiary, but who has
not been named in any legally binding document, may be a representative for the
purpose of receiving the IM. Such a representative should act in the beneficiary’s
best interests and in a manner that is protective of the beneficiary and the
beneficiary’s rights. Therefore, a representative should have no relevant conflict
of interest with the beneficiary.
• In instances where the notice is delivered to a representative who has not been
named in a legally binding document, the hospital must annotate the IM with the
name of the staff person initiating the contact, the name of the person contacted,
and the date, time, and method (in person or telephone) of the contact.
Delivery to off-site representatives
If the IM must be delivered to a representative who is not physically present, the hospital
is not required to personally deliver the IM or have the IM delivered via courier to the
representative. The hospital must complete the IM as required and may instead telephone
the representativeand then mail the IM. The date and time of the telephone call is
considered the receipt date of the IM.
The hospital must complete all of the following actions.
1. Verbally convey all contents of the IM;
2. Note the date and time this information is communicated verbally;
3. Annotate the “Additional Information” section to reflect that IM was
communicated verbally to the representative; and
4. Annotate the “Additional Information” section with the name of the staff person
initiating the contact, the name of the representative contacted by phone, the date
and time of the telephone contact, and the telephone number called.
5. Mail a copy of the annotated IM to the representative the day telephone contact is
made.
A hard copy of the IM must be sent to the representative by certified mail, return receipt
requested, or any other delivery method that can provide signed verification of delivery
(e.g., FedEx, UPS). The burden is on the hospital to demonstrate that timely contact was
attempted with the representative and that the notice was delivered.
If the hospital and the representative both agree, the hospital may send the notice by fax
or e-mail; however, the hospital or CAH’s fax and e-mail systems must meet the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) privacy and security
requirements.
History
(Rev. 11210; Issued: 01-21-2022; Effective: 04-21-2022; Implementation:04-21-2022)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
4a98a64bea285126e8044d6a3c269dd9b86add78d31ef18cdaa8bba103223b4e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.