US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 30, § 150.7
Appeal Rights
Nonparticipating suppliers have the same rights to appeal the contractor’s determination
in an unassigned claim for medical equipment and supplies if the contractor denies
payment on the basis of §1862(a)(1) , §1834(a)(17)(B) , §1834(j)(1), or §1834(a)(15) of
the Act as they or participating suppliers have in assigned claims. These rights of appeal
also extend to determinations that a refund is required either because the supplier knew or
should have known that Medicare would not pay for the item or service, or because the
beneficiary was not properly informed in writing in advance that Medicare would not pay
or was unlikely to pay for the item or service. In addition to the beneficiary’s right to
appeal the contractor’s decision to deny payment on the basis of §1862(a)(1),
§1834(a)(17)(B), §1834(j)(1), or §1834(a)(15) of the Act, the beneficiary becomes a
party to any appeal request filed by the supplier. Since the beneficiary and the supplier
may have adverse interests in a decision regarding refund, it is essential to notify the
beneficiary in any case in which the supplier requests an appeal of the denial or asserts
that a refund is not required because one of the conditions in §150.5 is met. (See Chapter
29, “Appeals of this Claims Decision,” for detailed appeals instructions.)
History
(Rev. 1587, Issued: 09-05-08, Effective: 03-03-08, Implementation: 03-01-09)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
d0b4609ff08e30530da87357961ce9e526241c670eef7a2cade54b9fdaaf7c42
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.