Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 30, § 150.5.2.8

Presumption for Medical Necessity

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

In the case of an optional request for an advance determination of coverage of a

customized item of medical equipment and supplies under §1834(a)(15)(C)(iii) of the Act

by the patient to whom the item is to be furnished or the supplier, in determining whether

the supplier knew, or could reasonably have been expected to know, that Medicare would

deny payment in advance under §1834(a)(15) of the Act, presume that the supplier knew

that Medicare would not pay in all cases in which you denied payment in advance on the

basis that the item is not reasonable and necessary under §1862(a)(1) of the Act or that

the item is not covered. This is a nonrebuttable presumption.

History

(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
017423dbbfa38be9285e81ca6d565257f5a4cb6e4316661ed6427feae8ed98bb
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.