Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 30, § 150.5.2.5

Presumption When Advance Determination was Requested

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

In determining whether the supplier knew, or could reasonably have been expected to

know, before furnishing the item, that Medicare would deny payment in advance under

§1834(a)(15) of the Act, presume that the supplier knew that Medicare would not pay in

all those cases in which a request for advance determination was made, and the contractor

denied payment in advance on the basis that the item is not reasonable and necessary

under §1862(a)(1) of the Act or that the item is not covered. This is a nonrebuttable

presumption.

History

(Rev. 1587, Issued: 09-05-08, Effective: 03-03-08, Implementation: 03-01-09)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
fb76e01b798afbf440af83386ab62a6ea1307f2130d92db5884e5f97a53c8d7f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.