Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 30, § 140.4

Situations Where a Refund Is Not Required

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

Under §1842(1), a refund is not required of the physician if either of the following

conditions is met:

1. The physician did not know and could not reasonably have been expected to

know that Medicare would not pay for the services because they were not

reasonable and necessary. To determine whether the physician knew, or could

reasonably have been expected to know, use the rules for determining physician

liability under §1879. (See §30.2.); or

2. Before the service was furnished, the physician notified the beneficiary in writing

of the likelihood that Medicare would not pay for the specific service and, after

being so informed, the beneficiary signed a statement agreeing to pay the

physician for the service.

To qualify for waiver of the refund requirements of §1842(1), the advance notice to the

beneficiary must be in writing, must clearly identify the particular service, must state that

the physician believes Medicare is likely to deny payment for the particular service, and

must give the physician’s reason(s) for his/her belief that Medicare is likely to deny

payment for the service. The Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN, Form CMS-R-131),

given in compliance with §40.3 and §50, satisfies the statutory requirements for the

physician’s advance notice and the beneficiary’s agreement to pay.

History

(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
fb198cb133a30de0923a7d49df9f761fce4bf8894c9ae3ed3f85361b326f4e57
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.