US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 29, § 330.1
Requests for an ALJ Hearing
A. Where Parties File Requests
To receive an ALJ hearing, a party to the QIC’s reconsideration must file a written request for
an ALJ hearing with the entity specified in the QIC’s reconsideration. The appellant must
also send a copy of the request for hearing to the other parties. Failure to do so will toll the
ALJ’s 90-day adjudication deadline until all parties to the QIC reconsideration receive notice
of the requested ALJ hearing. Also, if the request for hearing is timely filed with an entity
other than the entity specified in the QIC’s reconsideration, the ALJ’s deadline for deciding
the appeal begins on the date the entity specified in the QIC’s reconsideration (i.e., the
appropriate OMHA office) receives the request for hearing.
The QICs will specify the appropriate OMHA office as the filing location for ALJ hearing
requests.
B. Timely Filing Requirements
A party must file an ALJ request within 60 days of the date of their receipt of the QIC’s
decision. It is presumed that the appellant received the QIC’s decision within five days of the
date of the QIC’s decision, unless there is a reasonable showing by the appellant to the
contrary.
C. Content of the Request
The request for an ALJ hearing must be made in writing. The request must include all of
the following:
1. The name, address, and Medicare number of the beneficiary whose claim is
being appealed,
2. The name and address of the appellant, when the appellant is not the beneficiary,
3. The name and address of the designated representative, if any,
4. The document control number assigned to the appeal by the QIC, if any,
5. The dates of service,
6. The reasons the appellant disagrees with the QIC’s reconsideration or other
determination being appealed, and
7. A statement of any additional evidence to be submitted and the date it will be
submitted.
For the convenience of parties, OMHA provides forms that may be used to request a
Medicare ALJ hearing. It is not necessary, however, that this form be used to make a written
request.
• The request for hearing form “OMHA-100”:
https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/OMHA-100.pdf
• In addition, the form OMHA‑100A is used as an attachment to form OMHA‑100
to identify multiple beneficiaries or enrollees associated with a single request for
an ALJ hearing or a review of dismissal. The direct link to form “OMHA-
100A”:
https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/OMHA-100A-Multiple-Claim-
Attachment.pdf
• The link to OMHA’s webpage containing all forms:
https://www.hhs.gov/about/agencies/omha/filing-an-
appeal/forms/index.html
To request that OMHA make a decision without a hearing based only on the information that’s
in the appeal record, an appellant must submit the information required for an ALJ hearing
request and one of these:
• The “Waiver of Right to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Hearing” form
(Form OMHA-104) available at https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/OMHA-
104_Waiver_of_Right_to_an_ALJ_Hearing%200328.pdf; or
• A written request stating that you don’t wish to appear before an ALJ at a hearing
(including a hearing held by phone or video-teleconference), and explaining why
you decided to waive the hearing.
Even if a waiver of hearing is requested, a hearing may still be held by an ALJ if the other
parties in the case don’t also waive the ALJ hearing, or if the ALJ believes a hearing is
necessary to decide the case.
History
(Rev. 4278., Issued: 04-12-19, Effective: 06-13-19, Implementation: 06-13-19)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
6aed03464e2588c43da824a09ed3e4e448e14d19f88d748deb5bf25b483c5c81
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.