US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 29, § 320.4
QIC Case File Development
When the QIC receives a request for reconsideration, it will request the case file from the MAC
with jurisdiction using the Redetermination Case File Request Form. The QIC will send the
request either by email, telephone, fax, or by any other method agreed upon in the JOAs. (Note:
Individually identifiable beneficiary information should not be given in an unsecure email.) If
another method is agreed upon in the JOAs, it must meet the privacy requirements of HIPAA.
If agreed upon in the JOAs, the following requirements apply to email, fax and phone requests:
(a) Email requests - MACs shall maintain an email account specifically for the receipt of
case file requests from the QIC. If individually identifiable information is given in the request or
response, a secure email account must be used. MACs must check this email account at least once
daily (every business day). When MACs receive email requests from the QIC, they shall notify
the QIC of receipt.
(b) Phone Requests - MACs shall designate and maintain a phone extension specifically
for the receipt of case file requests from the QIC. MACs shall designate a main contact person
and back-up contact that is available to take phone calls during core business hours on all business
days (unless otherwise agreed upon in the JOAs).
(c) Fax Requests - MACs shall designate and maintain a fax machine for the receipt of case
file requests from the QIC.
History
(Rev. 4380, Issued: 08-30-19, Effective: 07-08-19, Implementation: 10- 01-19)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
657b77785b13de59d560420326cdb72c0cad756474b0433291c73cc0402c1564
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.