US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 29, § 310
Redetermination - The First Level of Appeal
A party dissatisfied with an initial determination may request that the MAC review its determination. A
redetermination is the first level of appeal after the initial determination on Part A and Part B claims. It is
a second look at the claim and supporting documentation and is made by an employee that did not take
part in the initial determination. If an initial determination is not made, there are no appeal rights on that
claim (see §200.C for a list of actions that are not initial determinations and therefore do not have appeal
rights).
The reviewer must comply with, and is bound by, all applicable statutory and regulatory provisions. The
reviewer may not overrule the provisions of the law or interpret them in a way different than CMS; nor may
the reviewer comment upon the legality, constitutional or otherwise, of any provision of the Act, regulations,
or CMS policy in the review determination. The reviewer is also bound by all CMS-issued policies and
procedures, including CMS rulings, Medicare manual instructions, change requests, national coverage
determinations, and local coverage determinations. The reviewer must consider the applicability of all
CMS-issued policies and procedures to the facts of a given claim. The reviewer may not change the amount
required to be paid under the Physician Fee Schedule.
History
(Rev. 2729, Issued: 06-21-13, Effective: 07-23-13, Implementation: 07-23-13)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
b7abf201822712b3a3ee4ab1455460a3fe3d924c89d3b584415520583b703e2d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.