US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 29, § 240.3
Conditions and Examples That May Establish Good Cause for Late Filing by
Providers, Physicians, or Other Suppliers
(Rev. 4278, Issued: 04-12-19, Effective: 06-13-19, Implementation: 06-13-19)
In general, A/B MACs (A), (B), (HHH), and DME MACs should not routinely find good cause when a
provider, physician or other supplier submits an untimely appeal request. However, good cause may be
found when the record clearly shows, or the provider, physician or other supplier alleges and the record
does not negate, that the delay in filing was due to one of the following:
• Incorrect or incomplete information about the subject claim and/or appeal was furnished by
official sources (CMS, the MACs, or the Social Security Administration) to the provider,
physician, or other supplier; or
• Unavoidable circumstances that prevented the provider, physician, or other supplier from timely
filing a request for redetermination. Unavoidable circumstances encompass situations that are
beyond the provider, physician or supplier’s control, such as major floods, fires, tornados, and other
natural catastrophes.
NOTE: Failure of a billing company or other consultant (that the provider, physician, or other supplier has
retained) to timely submit appeals or other information is NOT grounds for finding good cause for late
filing. The MAC does not find good cause where the provider, physician, or other supplier claims that lack
of business office management skills or expertise caused the late filing.
History
(Rev. 4278, Issued: 04-12-19, Effective: 06-13-19, Implementation: 06-13-19)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
b6c08b3b7f2d04e01391a841571bb04db98d8651f7eaa2d3bd6b3196c4f6e5b5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.