US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 29, § 220
Steps in the Appeals Process: Overview
Regulations at 42 CFR 405.940-405.942 provide that a party to a redetermination that is dissatisfied with an
initial determination may request that the contractor make a redetermination. The request for redetermination
must be filed within 120 days after the date of receipt of the notice of the initial determination (the notice of
initial determination is presumed to be received 5 days after the date of the notice unless there is evidence to
the contrary). Contractors cannot accept an appeal for which no initial determination has been made. The
parties specified in §210 who are dissatisfied with a determination on their Part A or B claim have appeal
rights.
The appeals process consists of five levels. The appellant must begin the appeal at the first level after
receiving an initial determination. Each level, after the initial determination, has procedural steps the
appellant must take before appealing to the next level. Each level is discussed in detail in subsequent
sections. If the appellant meets the procedural steps at a specific level (including the amount in controversy
(AIC) requirement if applicable), the appellant (and all other parties to the appeal decision) is then afforded
the right to appeal any determination or decision to the next level in the process. The appellant may exercise
the right to appeal any determination or decision to the next higher level, until appeal rights are exhausted.
Although there are five distinct levels in the Medicare appeals process, the redetermination, level 1, is the
only level in the appeals process that the contractor performs.
When an appellant requests a reconsideration with a QIC (level 2), the contractor must prepare and forward
the case file to the QIC. Further, the contractor may have effectuation responsibilities for decisions made by
the QIC. The contractor, however, does not have responsibility for reviewing the QIC’s decision for
accuracy. When an appellant requests an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearing or review by an attorney
adjudicator (level 3), the QIC must prepare and forward the case file to the OMHA. Further, the contractor
may have effectuation responsibilities for decisions made at OMHA, Departmental Appeals Board
(DAB)/Appeals Council, and Federal Court levels.
In the chart below, levels 1 – 4 are part of the Administrative Appeals Process. If an appellant has completed
all the first 4 steps of the administrative appeals process and is still dissatisfied, the appellant may appeal to
the Federal courts, provided the appellant satisfies the requirements for obtaining judicial review.
CHART 1 - The Medicare Fee-for-Service Appeals Process
APPEAL LEVEL TIME LIMIT FOR FILING
REQUEST
MONETARY
THRESHOLD TO BE MET
1. Redetermination 120 days from date of receipt
of the notice initial
determination
None
2. Reconsideration 180 days from date of receipt
of the redetermination*
None
3. Administrative Law
Judge (ALJ) Hearing
60 days from the date of
receipt of the reconsideration
Current AIC requirements can be
found on CMS.gov at:
http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Ap
peals-and-
Grievances/OrgMedFFSAppeals/
HearingsALJ.html.
See §250 for additional
information.
4. Departmental
Appeals Board (DAB)
Review/Appeals
Council
60 days from the date of
receipt of the ALJ hearing
decision
None
5. Federal Court
Review
60 days from date of receipt
of the Appeals Council
decision
Current AIC requirement can be
found on CMS.gov at:
http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Ap
peals-and-
Grievances/OrgMedFFSAppeals/
Review-Federal-District-Court.html. See §345 for
additional information
*NOTE: If a party requests QIC review of a contractor’s dismissal of a request for redetermination, the time
limit for filing a request for reconsideration is 60 days from the date of receipt of the contractor’s dismissal
notice.
History
(Rev. 4278, Issued: 04-12-19, Effective: 06-13-19, Implementation: 06-13-19)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
0cfab6de1c4d58214e32714270ea301fcf3842acdc663924a4dbc79335919d0b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.