Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 28, § 110.2

Preliminary Screening and Referral to Regional Office of the

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

Inspector General

(Rev. 2906, Issued: 03-14-14, Effective: 04-14-14, Implementation 04-14-14)

The Regional Office should perform preliminary screening activities, which may include

interviewing the complainant in person or by phone (if appropriate), in order to reach a

determination as to referral of the case for further investigation to the Special Agent in

Charge, Office of Investigations, Regional Office of the Inspector General, HHS.

At the point where the RO believes that there exists an indication of the violation of one

of the Federal penalty provisions, the RO should prepare a formal referral to the Regional

OIG. In cases where there is uncertainty as to whether the Federal law has been violated,

the case should be referred notwithstanding the uncertainty. The referral should reflect

the following information:

A. Type of violation, e.g., the complainant alleges a violation of §1882(d)(2);

B. Name, address, and telephone number of the complainant; and

C. A narrative description of the facts, which should include:

1. All circumstances regarding the contact made by the subject with the

beneficiary:

a. Type of contact (phone, personal);

b. Stated reason (if any) for selection of the beneficiary by the subject

making the contact, e.g.:

i. Beneficiary lives in a senior citizens community or

complex;

ii. The existence of another insurance policy with the same

company; and

iii. Referral by a third party.

2. Date, time, place, and duration of all contacts;

3. Words that were used to gain entry into the beneficiary’s home, e.g., “I’m

from Medicare,” “SSA,” or other Federal Government agency;

4. Details of the subject’s sales pitch or presentation:

a. Was there a discussion of the existence of other health insurance

policies currently held by the beneficiary?

b. Did the agent know that his policy was duplicative of Medicare or a

currently held policy?

c. Amount of premium of policy that agent was trying to sell. Obtain a

copy of the policy if possible;

d. Existence of any hard sell or intimidation tactics on the part of the

agent.

5. Details of the Agent’s exit:

a. Business card left by agent; and

b. Follow-up calls by agent or others.

D. Other Information:

1. Name of contact person in the Regional Office;

2. Copy of the original complaint; and

3. Any other supporting documentation.

History

(Rev. 2906, Issued: 03-14-14, Effective: 04-14-14, Implementation 04-14-14)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
21a913c31abcd82157f3d9bdb7b8086d2489fc481f4678545a85ec2fa6693cd1
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.