US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 24, § 90.7.4
Number of ASCA Enforcement Reviews to be Conducted by the
RRB SMAC
(Rev. 13105; Issued- 04-10-25; Effective: 05-12-25; Implementation: 05-12-25)
Due to the impact of ASCA review decisions made by A/B MACs (B), it would not be
reasonable to require that the RRB SMAC issue new ASCA review letters for 20 percent
of the providers who send them paper bills annually without giving the RRB SMAC
some credit for the additional effort expended as result of the PES-SuperPES-quarterly
paper claim submitters reports reviews the RMC is required to conduct. It takes the RRB
SMAC longer to identify providers that should be sent letters to initiate a new ASCA
review and in some cases, the cross checks performed by the RRB SMAC result in
disqualification of a provider for selection for a new ASCA Enforcement Review. To
adjust for this, the RRB SMAC annual ASCA review target is to review the records of 20
percent of those providers who submit paper claims as indicated in the MCS quarterly
paper claim submitters reports, and not to necessarily initiate a new ASCA review of 20
percent of the providers that send them paper claims annually.
To compute this 20 percent, the total number of providers for whom reviews are to be
conducted shall be computed as directed in §90.5.3. To gauge the number to be reviewed
during a single quarter in the same FY prior to production of the fourth quarterly report
for that FY, the RRB SMAC shall multiply the total of providers who submitted paper
bills in the most recent quarterly report by 0.2 (20 percent), and then multiply again by
.25. The number of reviews to be initiated during the fourth quarter shall be computed by
subtracting the total reviews identified as conducted for the first three quarters of the FY
from the total number of reviews targeted for the FY as a whole; the difference in the
totals is the number of reviews to be started during the fourth quarter.
For purposes of the monthly ASCA review report submitted to DSSMdata.info prior to
the fourth quarter of a FY, the total number of providers in the MCS most recent
quarterly paper claim submitters report shall be entered in the “eligible providers” field.
The total number of providers in that quarterly report for whom ASCA review letters are
actually issued to begin reviews plus those for whom a decision is made that a new
review is not warranted at that time due to an ASCA review action taken by another
Medicare contractor shall be entered in the “Initial Review Letters Issued for Report
Period” field of the monthly DSSMdata.info report. CMS realizes that an initial review
letter will not actually have been issued by the RRB SMAC to each provider in this
second situation, but the RRB SMAC review of ASCA data in SuperPES for those
providers selected from the MCS quarterly paper claim submitters report which result in
decisions not to initiate new reviews will be considered as equivalent to initiation of a
new review by CMS for comparison purposes with A/B MACs (B) and to determine if
the annual 20 percent target has been reached by the RRB SMAC . The number of
ASCA reviews completed total to be entered in the monthly report shall equal the number
of ASCA reviews completed during the reporting period that were initiated with an
ASCA review letter plus the number of new ASCA reviews that were determined not to
be warranted that month as result of review of ASCA information in SuperPES that same
month.
For the fourth quarter of the FY, the total number of providers as computed for the FY
who are eligible for review, i.e., the total who submitted paper claims in each of the
quarterly ASCA reports for the FY divided by four, shall be entered in the DSSMdata.info
monthly report as the number of “Eligible Providers.” The RRB SMAC shall follow the
direction in the prior paragraph to calculate the number of ‘Initial Review Letters Issued
for Report Period” and the “Reviews Completed” totals to be entered in those fields of
the DSSMdata.info reports for the months in that final quarter. The remaining fields of
the monthly ASCA reports are to be completed by the RRB SMAC according to the
existing completion instructions for that report which were previously issued to the
Medicare contractors.
History
(Rev. 13105; Issued- 04-10-25; Effective: 05-12-25; Implementation: 05-12-25)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
2577c175a1772e69ae070f8dc33536a25f8d539814dca81bdfd011bc7befb86f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.