US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 24, § 90.7.1
RRB SMAC Entry of ASCA Enforcement Review Decisions and
EDI Enrollment Information from Other Medicare Contractors into
PES
(Rev. 2803, Issued: 10-28-13, Effective: 09-17-13, Implementation: 09-17-13)
To take advantage of the information being added to SuperPES, the RRB SMAC shall do
the following:
• When using SuperPES to establish an initial record in PES for a
provider--If available in SuperPES, the RRB SMAC shall copy any
ASCA review result information and the provider’s ZIP Code, (extended
if available), as well as those data elements that would have been copied in
the past, and include that information in PES. If there is an NE entry in
the ASCA review decision field, the RRB SMAC shall manually issue
letter G to the provider to notify the provider that paper claims submitted
to the RRB SMAC beginning on the 91st day after the date of the letter
will be denied unless the provider can establish eligibility for one of the
ASCA exceptions. See information later in this section on use of ASCA
decision codes in selection of providers to be sent an ASCA Enforcement
review letter. If no evidence has been received by the 45th day after the
date of that letter, MCS shall trigger release of letter D. MCS shall trigger
release of letter E and begin denying paper claims on the 91st day after the
date of letter G as if a normal ASCA review was being conducted, unless
the provider submits documentation that results in cancellation of the
denial by the RRB SMAC.
• When a provider for whom a PES record was previously established
is selected from the shared system’s quarterly paper claim submitters
report to initiate a new ASCA Enforcement Review-- The RRB SMAC
shall look up each selected provider that has been tentatively selected for
an ASCA review in the most recent SuperPES file to see if a record can be
located based upon the information the RRB SMAC has available for that
provider. When able to locate a record, the RRB SMAC shall add any
ASCA review results from another Medicare contractor for that provider
and the ZIP Code (extended if available) for that provider to PES. An
“NE” decision shall be converted to “NR.” See information later in this
section on use of ASCA decision codes in selection of providers to be sent
an ASCA Enforcement Review letter. The RRB SMAC will use the
shared system’s quarterly report to trigger release of letter H to notify the
provider that paper claims they submit beginning on the 91st day after the
date of the letter will be denied. If no response is received after 45 days,
MCS shall trigger release of letter D. If no response is received to letter
D, or there is a response but it will not result in a decision to allow the
provider to continue to submit paper claims, MCS shall trigger release of
letter E and begin denying paper claims submitted following the regular
procedures for an ASCA Enforcement Review.
• If the RRB SMAC learns that a provider that sends paper claims to
the RRB SMAC and sends electronic claims to one or more other
Medicare contractors-When this information comes to the attention of
the RRB SMAC as result of an action other than establishment of an initial
record in PES or selection of a provider for review from the quarterly
ASCA report, the RRB SMAC shall check the provider’s record in
SuperPES and in the last quarterly paper claim submitters report received
from MCS. If there are no ASCA Enforcement Review results in
SuperPES that would preclude initiation of an ASCA Enforcement
Review (see §90.7.2), the RRB SMAC shall use the quarterly report to
trigger release of letter H. MCS shall trigger letters D and E as
appropriate in a regular ASCA Enforcement Review unless the RRB
SMAC cancels denial of the paper claims because the provider responded
and was able to establish grounds for continued submission of paper
claims to the RRB SMAC. If the RRB SMAC has already initiated all
reviews targeted for that quarter, the RRB SMAC may initiate this review
as part of the next quarter’s reviews.
If the ASCA information in SuperPES for a provider indicate that the provider was
determined to be eligible for continued submission of paper claims as result of an ASCA
review, the RRB SMAC shall enter that ASCA exception/waiver decision in PES for
future reference. If a provider alleges that contrary to a NE ASCA review determination
in SuperPES, they do not submit Medicare claims to any MAC electronically and that
provider furnishes a letter from another MAC that indicates an ASCA exception/waiver
determination that is not yet reflected in SuperPES, the RRB SMAC is to enter the
appropriate ASCA decision code in PES for the provider and shall not deny the
provider’s paper claims for ASCA purposes.
In the absence of such a letter however, the RRB SMAC is to assume that providers that
have an NE entry in SuperPES do submit electronic claims to at least one other MAC, do
submit 10 or more claims electronically to Medicare overall and can also submit claims
to the RRB SMAC electronically. The RRB SMAC is to use the most recent MCS
quarterly paper claim submitters report, or if all reviews targeted for that quarter have
already been initiated, the next quarterly paper claim submitters report received to trigger
release of letter H in that situation. MCS shall trigger letters D and E and begin denial of
that provider’s paper claims on the 91st day unless the RMC delays or cancels the denial
action.
History
(Rev. 2803, Issued: 10-28-13, Effective: 09-17-13, Implementation: 09-17-13)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
67180cda8cf574a3910cf7ec9cf085a631f9add8278ff2f7fbf0411addd0f019
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.