Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 24, § 40.2.4.7.2

Vendor Selection

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

Once a provider has determined its own goals and requirements, it must begin the vendor

selection process. Selecting a vendor must be as objective and quantitative as possible.

Areas to be evaluated should include technical functionality, flexibility, and customer

service. The following steps may be used as guidelines for providers to start the vendor

selection process:

1. Develop a list of potential vendors:

• Ask the Medicare A/B MACs and CEDI for a list of approved vendors;

• Ask other providers of comparable size/specialties what vendors they use for what

services and how satisfied they are;

• Ask a consultant;

• Attend standards conferences, follow trade magazines and investigate Web pages.

2. Call or write the vendors selected/recommended to discuss the organization’s needs

and request a proposal.

3. Tell the vendors how the proposals should be structured so that the various proposals

can be more easily compared.

4. Attend demonstrations of at least two to three vendors and pay close attention to:

• How individual requirements will be met;

• Ease of understanding;

• Ease of features - data entry, search features, editing/compliance checking

features, help features, error correction features;

• Security - disaster recovery plans, controls, and audits;

• Daily Procedures;

• Reporting/Tracking features.

5. Check vendor references and ask specific questions such as:

• How long has the business been in operation?

• How long has the system been in place?

• What is the quality of the training and ongoing support?

• Is there a user’s group in place?

• What formats are supported?

6. Check with providers served by the vendor and ask specific questions such as:

• Have you experienced any problems with the system?

• Have you experienced any problems with the vendor?

• How long did it take to get up and running?

• Are you happy with the system/vendor and would you recommend it/them today?

• Is there anything else I should know or ask before making my decision?

Make site visits to the vendor as well as other clients of similar size and bill mix that have

been running the system for some time.

History

(Rev. 2803, Issued: 10-28-13, Effective: 09-17-13, Implementation: 09-17-13)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
0216a0f5ef4ff5693ec655656c46e6f4ee0977426d2b3fb7f29f3ba4a1e29585
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.