US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 22, § 40.2
Generating an ERA if Required Data is Missing or Invalid
The ASC X12 835 IG contains specific data requirements, which must be met to build a
HIPAA compliant ERA. A claim could be received on paper that lacks data or has data
that does not meet the data attributes or length requirements for preparation of a HIPAA-compliant ERA. If not rejected as a result of standard or IG level editing, a MAC must
either send an SPR advice or a “gap filled” ERA to avoid noncompliance with HIPAA.
For example, if a procedure code is sent with only four characters and the code set
specified in the IG includes five character codes in the data element, and the code is not
rejected by the front end edits, the claim would be denied due to the invalid procedure
code. Preparation of an ERA with too few characters though would not comply with the
IG requirements. The noncompliant ERA could be rejected by the receiver.
The shared system maintainers, working in conjunction with their MACs, must decide
whether to generate an SPR, which is not covered by HIPAA, or to “gap fill” in this
situation, depending on system capability and cost. Except in some very rare situations,
“gap filling” would be expected to be the preferred solution. Shared System Maintainers
must follow CMS gap-filling instruction. The MAC must notify the trading partners, if
and when their files are affected, as to when and why gap-filling characters will appear in
an ASC X12 835.
History
(Rev. 2843, Issued: 12-27-13, Effective: 01-28-14, Implementation: 01-28-14)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
9e6ae5ff154f64f9d727af2b7ef2e306cd135e8e0a640b51c71dc355753ef628
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.