Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 20, § 100.3

Limitations on DME MAC Collection of Information

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

B-02-031

The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 §44 USC 3500, et seq. requires that the

Director of the Office of Management and Budget approve any collections of information

performed by or for the Federal Government unless the collection fits within exceptions

for audits and investigations. Absent such approval, the collection violates the PRA and

agencies may not hold the public to the requirement. Therefore, DME MACs must

adhere to the following:

1. Power operated vehicles additional documentation requirements

A Certificate of Medical Necessity (CMN) must accompany initial claims for power

operated vehicles (POV). Except during the course of audits and investigations, DME

MACs must not require that additional documentation accompany all POV claims. DME

MACs may continue requesting information during the course of audits and

investigations and when developing individual claims on either a pre- or a post-payment

basis. If DME MACs choose to conduct such investigations, they must follow the

guidelines in the Program Integrity Manual, Chapter 3.

2. Power wheelchair additional documentation requirements re: make and model

name/number

There must be no requirement that all claims for power wheelchairs include the make and

model name/number of the wheelchair separate from the claim or the CMN.

The CMN, an OMB approved information collection form, can be used to collect this

information. Specifically, DME MACs can require that the make and model name/

number of the power wheelchair be included in Section C of the CMN. Section C

requires the supplier to include a narrative description of the items, options and

accessories ordered.

3. Power wheelchair additional documentation requirements re: functional abilities

There must be no requirement for suppliers to submit additional documentation to

describe a beneficiary's medical condition and functional abilities when the supplier bills

for a higher level of equipment than previously supplied.

While it is appropriate to avoid paying for duplicate equipment, it is inappropriate to

require this documentation for all claims for "higher level equipment." DME MACs may

choose to perform pre- or post- payment probe samples to review these types of claims

individually in order to determine medical necessity. If DME MACs choose to conduct

such investigations, they must follow the guidelines in the Program Integrity Manual,

Chapter 3.

History

(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
1ecf41c232cec2e67e602f7a80c3987d437784d7ce5f068488d5a55b9d807b41
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.