Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 17, § 20.5.6

Inherent Reasonableness for Drugs and Biologicals

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

Section 4316 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 permits A/B MACs (B) to establish realistic and

equitable payment amounts for drugs when the existing payment amounts are inherently unreasonable

because they are either grossly excessive or deficient. Refer to chapter 23, for a complete description

of Inherent Reasonableness rules.

Examples of the factors that may result in grossly deficient or excessive payment amounts include, but

are not limited to the following:

1. Payment amounts for drugs or biologicals are grossly higher or lower than acquisition or

production costs for the category of items or services.

2. There have been increases in payment amounts that cannot be explained by inflation or

technology.

In some instances, the calculation of the AWP may lead to a payment limit that is not reasonable for the

purpose of paying for drugs and biologicals. A/B MACs (B) can apply the principal of inherent

reasonableness in selecting the drugs to be included in the calculation. For instance in situations where

there are some drugs in a HCPCS grouping that are significantly more expensive due to having

preservatives added, there is no effect on the quality of the drug whether or not there are preservatives.

Therefore, leave the drugs with preservatives out of the calculation.

While A/B MACs (A) and (B) may determine under their inherent reasonableness authority that a

greater than 15 percent increase or decrease in payment amounts is warranted, they may not increase or

decrease the payment amounts for any item by greater than 15 percent in any given year. However, a

contractor may determine that a 25 percent reduction is warranted, and accomplish the adjustment over

2 years, e.g., 15 percent applied the first year, and 10 percent applied the following year.

In addition, a contractor must inform CMS of any inherent reasonableness determinations. The CMS

will then acknowledge receipt of the notification. The payment adjustment may not take effect until the

contractor has notified CMS and received CMS’s acknowledgment of the notification.

History

(Rev. 11140, Issued: 12-02-21, Effective :01-04-22, Implementation: 01-04-22)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
72b8ddfbfc045fe08d0b8115161fe7c8155b0974b3d99d944e0616bc89bc6f22
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 17, § 20.5.6 — Inherent Reasonab… · binding.law