US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 17, § 101
The Competitive Acquisition Program (CAP) for Drugs and
Instructions on Special CAP Appeals Requirements and Delivery of
Dispute Resolution Services
(Rev. 1076, Issued: 10-13-2006; Effective: 07-01-06; Implementation: 11-13-06)
All appeals of denied CAP claims will be processed by the local A/B MAC (B). This
includes an appeal for the denial of an approved CAP vendor’s drug product claim. This
break from the traditional administrative appeals process is necessitated by the
arrangement whereby the CAP designated A/B MAC (B) pays the approved CAP vendor
claim only after a match is found in the central claims processing system indicating the
corresponding participating CAP physician’s drug administration claim was paid by the
local A/B MAC (B). As a result, the only appealable issues attach to the decision of the
local A/B MAC (B).
The CAP claims processing arrangement departs from the standard Part B claims
processing routine. The A/B MAC (B) will make an initial determination on whether the
participating CAP physician’s claim for drug administration is payable by applying local
coverage determinations (LCDs) to the administration and to the drugs billed as no-pay
on the claim. If the A/B MAC (B) finds the no-pay or administration lines are contrary to
the LCDs, it will deny the administration and pass on a non-approved indicator on the no-pay lines. The A/B MAC (B) sends a pay process indicator to CWF for each of the no-pay lines. When the designated A/B MAC (B) enters the vendor claim into the system,
CWF looks for a match. When CWF goes to find the match, it will not match against
non-approved lines. If it finds a match among the approved lines, then it lets the
designated A/B MAC (B) know and the claim is paid. If it doesn’t find a match, the
claim recycles for 90 days. Periodically during the 90 days, the designated A/B MAC
(B) looks for a match again. If it finds one, the claim pays. If after 90 days it doesn't find
a match, then the claim denies. The A/B MAC (B) will notify CWF whether the
approved CAP vendor’s claim for the drug is payable. If the vendor’s claim is not
payable because of a determination of the A/B MAC (B), then the designated A/B MAC
(B) will be notified. In turn, the designated A/B MAC (B) will deny the approved CAP
vendor’s claim. The claims processing requirements for this process have been described
in previous CAP Change Requests.
Because the A/B MAC (B)’s initial determination on the drug administration claim
decides the outcome of the of the approved CAP vendor’s drug product claim, CMS
interprets the initial determination to be an initial determination of the approved CAP
vendor’s drug product claim for the purposes of the Part B appeals regulations found at
42 CFR 405.801. Accordingly, the approved CAP vendor shall not file its appeal with
the CAP designated A/B MAC (B). Rather, the approved CAP vendor shall file its
appeal with the A/B MAC (B), with one exception.
That exception is the case where the approved CAP vendor’s drug product claim was
denied because there was no matching claim filed by the participating CAP physician
after 90 days of recycling. In this instance, the designated A/B MAC (B) will deny the
approved CAP vendor’s drug product claim and suppress appeal rights. The remittance
notice will instruct the approved CAP vendor that it may request a reopening. Upon
receipt of a reopening request, the designated A/B MAC (B) will contact the participating
CAP physician and request that he or she fulfill his or her CAP participation agreement
by filing the drug administration claim. If the participating CAP physician does not
follow through as required, then the designated A/B MAC (B) will initiate the dispute
resolution track discussed below.
In the role of the furnishing Medicare supplier, the approved CAP vendor is a party to
any appeal of a denied drug administration claim filed by a participating CAP physician
with the A/B MAC (B). The balance of the rules pertaining to the A/B MAC (B)’s
adjudication of Part B appeals applies (See Pub. 100-04, Chapter 29), with the following
exceptions:
a) The A/B MAC (B) will check for duplicate appeals. If the participating CAP
physician and the approved CAP vendor filed independent appeals connected with
the same service, then the A/B MAC (B) will merge the two files.
b) The A/B MAC (B) will ensure the approved CAP vendor is copied on all
correspondence connected with the participating CAP physician’s appeal of the
denied drug administration claim.
History
(Rev. 1076, Issued: 10-13-2006; Effective: 07-01-06; Implementation: 11-13-06)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
69e2839726a522e0329b2562373ec489318a765551eb2291066cf3983faaff72
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.