Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 16, § 90.3.1

History Display

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

Prior to January 1, 2018, when displaying claims payment for each CPT code in history,

A/B MACs (A) and (B) apply the following rules:

1. If all component tests of any panel are allowed because the individual line item

comparison is less than the fee (as determined in item C above), record the panel codes as

determined on the line-by-line comparison.

2. If all component tests are paid based on the panel price, allocate the current

payment proportionate to the amount submitted for each CPT code.

3. If any panel tests will be denied or there are previously paid automated laboratory

tests (as indicated by a check of beneficiary history), allocate the current payment amount

by allowed line proportionate to what was submitted for the current claim being

processed.

For administration of pricing requirements and/or invalid coding policies, A/B MACs (A)

and (B) must establish a processing sequence for concurrently processed claims based on

ascending order of internal control number (ICN). In the case of pricing, they must

process the “first claim” (i.e., lower CN) based solely on the billed codes on that claim,

process the “second” claim based on a combination of the billed codes on both claims

and pay the balance due after subtracting the amount paid on the “first” claim. In the

case of unacceptable code combinations, A/B MACs (A) and (B) must deny the “second”

claim.

History

(Rev. 4299, Issued: 05-03-19, Effective: 01-01-19, Implementation: 10-07-19)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
b4291156f89c2cc484e83a995e14faebdb43d352c6a084b8f7a7d0d049faecfd
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.