US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 16, § 90.3.1
History Display
Prior to January 1, 2018, when displaying claims payment for each CPT code in history,
A/B MACs (A) and (B) apply the following rules:
1. If all component tests of any panel are allowed because the individual line item
comparison is less than the fee (as determined in item C above), record the panel codes as
determined on the line-by-line comparison.
2. If all component tests are paid based on the panel price, allocate the current
payment proportionate to the amount submitted for each CPT code.
3. If any panel tests will be denied or there are previously paid automated laboratory
tests (as indicated by a check of beneficiary history), allocate the current payment amount
by allowed line proportionate to what was submitted for the current claim being
processed.
For administration of pricing requirements and/or invalid coding policies, A/B MACs (A)
and (B) must establish a processing sequence for concurrently processed claims based on
ascending order of internal control number (ICN). In the case of pricing, they must
process the “first claim” (i.e., lower CN) based solely on the billed codes on that claim,
process the “second” claim based on a combination of the billed codes on both claims
and pay the balance due after subtracting the amount paid on the “first” claim. In the
case of unacceptable code combinations, A/B MACs (A) and (B) must deny the “second”
claim.
History
(Rev. 4299, Issued: 05-03-19, Effective: 01-01-19, Implementation: 10-07-19)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
b4291156f89c2cc484e83a995e14faebdb43d352c6a084b8f7a7d0d049faecfd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.