Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 16, § 50.5.2

Examples of Reference Laboratory Jurisdiction Rules

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

B3-3102

EXAMPLE 1:

Scenario 1:

An independent laboratory located in Oregon performs laboratory services for physicians

whose offices are located in several neighboring States. A physician from Nevada sends

specimens to the Oregon laboratory.

Jurisdiction: The A/B MAC (B) in Oregon has jurisdiction.

EXAMPLE 2:

Scenario 2: American Laboratories, Inc., is an independent laboratory company with

branch laboratories located in Philadelphia, PA and Wilmington, DE, as well as regional

laboratories located in Millville, NJ and Boston, MA.

The Philadelphia laboratory receives a blood sample from a patient whose physician

ordered a complete blood count, a basic metabolic panel and a B12 and folate. The

Philadelphia laboratory performs the complete blood count, but the basic metabolic panel

is performed at the Millville laboratory, while the B12 and folate is performed at the

Boston Laboratory.

Jurisdiction: The Pennsylvania A/B MAC (B) may retain jurisdiction for processing the

claim for all of the services. The A/B MAC (B) servicing Boston and/or Millville may

have jurisdiction for processing their claims if those laboratories bill for the services they

perform, but the Philadelphia laboratory is barred from billing for the services that

Boston and Millville submit for payment.

EXAMPLE 3:

Scenario 3: Same relationships as in Example 2. American Laboratories, Inc., is an

independent laboratory company with branch laboratories located in Philadelphia, PA

and Wilmington, DE, as well as regional laboratories located in Millville, NJ and Boston,

MA.

This time the Wilmington laboratory draws a blood specimen from a patient whose

physician has ordered a blood culture. The Wilmington laboratory then sends the

specimen to the Boston laboratory, which performs the required test.

Jurisdiction: The A/B MAC (B) processing claims for providers/suppliers located in

Delaware may retain jurisdiction for processing the claim. If the laboratory in Boston

chooses to bill for the service to the Massachusetts A/B MAC (B), then the Wilmington

laboratory may not bill for the service.

History

(Rev. 85, 02-06-04)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
29808fc8faf2dbfbfde598df6e5ba608a5b56ca3e53d8a703ee4df574064ad70
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 16, § 50.5.2 — Examples of Refer… · binding.law