US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 13, § 150
Place of Service (POS) Instructions for the Professional
Component (PC or Interpretation) and the Technical Component (TC)
of Diagnostic Tests
(Rev. 3315, Issued: 08-06-15, Effective: 01-01-16, Implementation: 01-04-16)
Many of the diagnostic services, including radiology services, provided by
physicians/practitioners contain both a technical component (TC) and a professional
component (PC). Often, the PC and TC of diagnostic services are furnished in different
settings. As a general policy, the POS code assigned by the physician/practitioner for the
PC of a diagnostic service shall be the setting in which the beneficiary received the TC
service.
A. Interpretation Provided Telephonically by Wireless Remote
Teleradiology services (radiology services that do not require a face-to-face encounter
with the patient furnished through the use of a telecommunications system) are discussed
in Pub. 100-02, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, chapter 15, section 30. The
interpretation of an x-ray, electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram and tissue samples
are listed as examples of these services.
In cases where the face-to-face requirement is obviated such as those when a
physician/practitioner provides the PC/interpretation of a diagnostic test, from a distant
site, the POS code assigned by the physician /practitioner shall be the setting in which the
beneficiary received the TC service. The POS code for a teleradiology interpretation is
generally the place where the beneficiary received the TC, or face-to-face encounter. The
POS code representing the setting where the beneficiary received the TC is entered in the
ASC X12 837 professional claim format or in item 24B on the paper claim Form CMS
1500. In cases where it is unclear which POS code applies, the Medicare contractor can
provide guidance.
For example: A beneficiary receives an MRI on an outpatient hospital campus near
his/her home. The outpatient hospital submits a claim that would correspond to the TC
portion of the MRI. The physician furnishes the PC portion of the beneficiary’s MRI
from his/her office location - POS code 22 (On Campus-Outpatient Hospital) shall be
used on the physician’s claim to indicate that the beneficiary received the face-to-face
portion of the MRI, the TC, on the campus of an outpatient hospital.
B. Interpretation Provided Outside of the United States
Generally, Medicare will not pay for health care or supplies that are performed outside
the United States (U.S.). The term “outside the U.S.” means anywhere other than the 50
states of the U.S., the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam,
American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands. See Pub. 100-02, chapter 16,
section 60, for exceptions to the “outside the U.S.” exclusions.
C. Interpretation Provided Under Arrangement - To A Hospital
Separate TC and PC
If a diagnostic test which has a separate TC and PC is provided under arrangement to a
hospital, the physician who reads the test can bill and be paid for the professional
component. Both the technical and professional components of the test are also subject
to the physician self-referral prohibition.
The appropriate POS code for the interpretation (or PC) is the setting where the
beneficiary received the TC service. If the interpretation is performed in the physician’s
office and the patient received the TC service in the provider-based outpatient hospital
setting, the physician assigns POS code 22, for On Campus-Outpatient Hospital, or POS
19, for Off Campus-Outpatient Hospital, on the claim for the interpretation or PC.
Global Service
When a physician performs a diagnostic test under arrangement to a hospital and the test
and the interpretation are not separately billable, the interpretation cannot be billed by the
physician. In this scenario, the hospital is the only entity that can bill for the diagnostic
test which encompasses the interpretation. There is no POS code for the interpretation
since a physician claim is not generated.
D. Global Billing
Billing globally for services that are split into PC and TC components is only possible
when the TC and the physician who provides the PC of the diagnostic service are
furnished by the same physician or supplier entity and the PC and TC components are
furnished within the same Medicare physician fee schedule payment locality. Merely
applying the same POS code to the PC as that of the TC (as described in “A” above) does
not permit global billing for any diagnostic procedure.
E. Determination of Payment Locality
Under the Medicare physician fee schedule (MPFS), payment amounts are based on the
relative resources required to provide services and vary among payment localities as
resource costs vary geographically as measured by the geographic practice cost indices
(GPCIs). The payment locality is determined based on the location where a specific
service code was furnished. For purposes of determining the appropriate payment
locality, CMS requires that the address, including the ZIP code for each service code be
included on the claim form in order to determine the appropriate payment locality. The
location in which the service code was furnished is entered on the ASC X12 837
professional claim format or in Item 32 on the paper claim Form CMS 1500.
Global Service Code
If the global diagnostic service code is billed, the biller (either the entity that took the test,
physician who interpreted the test, or separate billing agent) must report the address and
ZIP code of where the test was furnished on the bill for the global diagnostic service
code. In other words, when the global diagnostic service code is billed, for example,
chest x-ray as described by HCPCS code 71010 (no modifier TC and no modifier -26),
the locality is determined by the ZIP code applicable to the testing facility, i.e. where the
TC of the chest x-ray was furnished. The testing facility (or its billing agent) enters the
address and ZIP code of the setting/location where the test took place. This practice
location is entered using the ASC X12 837 professional claim format or in Item 32 on the
paper claim Form CMS 1500. As explained in D above, in order to bill for a global
diagnostic service code, the same physician or supplier entity must furnish both the TC
and the PC of the diagnostic service and the TC and PC must be furnished within the
same MPFS payment locality.
Separate Billing of Professional Interpretation
If the same physician or other supplier entity does not furnish both the TC and PC of the
diagnostic service, or if the same physician or other supplier entity furnishes both the TC
and PC but the professional interpretation was furnished in a different payment locality
from where the TC was furnished, the professional interpretation of a diagnostic test must
be separately billed with modifier -26 by the interpreting physician.
When the physician’s interpretation of a diagnostic test is billed separately from the
technical component, as identified by modifier -26, the interpreting physician (or his or
her billing agent) must report the address and ZIP code of the interpreting physician’s
location on the claim form. If the professional interpretation was furnished at an unusual
and infrequent location for example, a hotel, the locality of the professional interpretation
is determined based on the Medicare enrolled location where the interpreting physician
most commonly practices. The address and ZIP code of this practice location is entered
using the ASC X12 837 professional claim format or in Item 32 on the paper claim Form
CMS 1500.
History
(Rev. 3315, Issued: 08-06-15, Effective: 01-01-16, Implementation: 01-04-16)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
92ef623921d83cd459822fe81c14f6f3d8d79c0f8808176a30aa888063de4a17
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.