US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 12, § 30.6.12.3
Critical Care Visits Furnished Concurrently by Different
Specialties
(Rev. 11288; Issued: 03-04-22; Effective: 01-01-22; Implementation: 02-15-22)
Concurrent care is when more than one physician renders services that are more extensive than
consultative services during a period of time. The reasonable and necessary services of each
physician furnishing concurrent care is covered when each plays an active role in the patient’s
treatment. In the context of critical care services, a critically ill patient may have more than one
medical condition requiring diverse, specialized medical services and requiring more than one
practitioner, each having a different specialty, playing an active role in the patient’s treatment.
Medicare policy allows critical care visits furnished as concurrent care (or concurrently) to the
same patient on the same date by more than one practitioner in more than one specialty (for
example, an internist and a surgeon, allergist and a cardiologist, neurosurgeon and NPP),
regardless of group affiliation, if the service meets the definition of critical care and is not
duplicative of other services. Additionally, these critical care visits need to be medically
reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the
functioning of a malformed body member.
History
(Rev. 11288; Issued: 03-04-22; Effective: 01-01-22; Implementation: 02-15-22)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
b81f8f288e5c6cdf2cae98afbeacdf0164ec588da198ecd5739d4be2e1d9d003
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.