US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 10, § 30.4
Provider/Supplier Inquiries to MACs Based on Eligibility
Responses
(Rev. 1348, Issued: 10-05-07, Effective: 01-01-08, Implementation: 11-05-07)
Institutional providers and/or suppliers may want to follow-up on information they
receive, usually to contact the primary agency on file to bill under arrangement. The
provider or supplier may determine the HHA’s A/B MAC (HHH) from the CMS Web
site which has a list of A/B MACs (HHH) that process HH claims by State. The provider
or supplier also may ask its own MAC through existing provider inquiry channels. That
MAC will instruct the provider regarding which A/B MAC (HHH) that processes HH
claims to contact to learn which HHA is involved.
A/B MACs (HHH) that process HH claims may provide information on either the
provider or A/B MAC (HHH) that these providers may request. Information released
will be determined by each MAC, such as HHA name and address, but must be enough
for the inquiring provider/supplier to contact either the primary HHA, if under that A/B
MAC (HHH)’s jurisdiction, or another A/B MAC (HHH), if the provider number is
attached to another A/B MAC (HHH). If an instance ever exists where a provider is an
individual, such as a provider doing business using a Social Security Number as a tax
identification number, information cannot be released, since it would violate the
individual’s right to privacy.
History
(Rev. 1348, Issued: 10-05-07, Effective: 01-01-08, Implementation: 11-05-07)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
08b06c85a4587ff3489d93ad42b0311724811721ddf53af7f790acd62221c660
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.