US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 4, § 250.18
CAH Method II Line Level Rendering Provider Billing
For Critical Access Hospital (CAH) billing under Method II (the optional payment
method), CMS and the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) require the
rendering practitioner’s National Provider Identifier (NPI) to be reported at the line
level if it differs from the rendering NPI submitted at the claim level.
CMS implemented Change Request (CR) 7578, “Fiscal Intermediary Shared System
(FISS) and Common Working File (CWF) System Enhancement for Storing Line Level
Rendering Physicians/Practitioners National Provider Identifier (NPI) and Physician
Specialty Code Information.” This change enabled the display and storage of line-level
NPIs for combined billing of professional and institutional services on the CMS-1450
(UB-04) institutional claim form and was implemented to support HIPAA-compliant
processing.
Medicare must be able to determine the line level rendering professional for each
outpatient service on a combined billing claim submitted to Medicare and store this
information in our databases for data analysis purposes. The primary rendering
professional is also used to support standard claims processing, medical review, fraud
detection, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliance,
identifying revoked practitioners, Office of Inspector General (OIG)
audits/overpayments, supporting program planning and capturing potential practitioner-
level incentives tied to the NPI.
As previously instructed, HIPAA requires that if the claim level rendering provider is
different from the attending provider, that a claim level rendering provider be reported.
HIPAA also requires that if the line level rendering provider is different than the claim
level rendering provider for combined claims that contain both facility and professional
charges, the line level rendering provider must be reported. Please ensure these
guidelines are followed. Affected Medicare providers are CAHs billing under Method II
and Federally Qualified Health Centers/ Rural Health Clinics (FQHCs/RHCs).
Prior to the implementation of the 5010 version of the 837I transaction, rendering
provider information could only be captured at the claim level. However, since 2012,
line-level rendering provider reporting has been required to ensure more accurate
tracking.
Line-level rendering provider editing applies to Type of Bill (TOB) 085X and revenue
codes 096X, 097X, and 098X, following the hierarchy below:
• Line Level "Rendering Physician" field when populated, or
• Claim level “Rendering Physician" field where a line level "Rendering Provider" field
is blank, or
• Claim level "Attending Physician” field if the claim level “Rendering Provider" field is
blank.
NOTE: Blank NPI line level rendering provider information indicates the claim level
rendering provider performed the professional services. Blank NPI claim level rendering
provider information indicates the attending provider performed the professional
services.
Please read the situational rule for Loop: 2420C — RENDERING PROVIDER NAME in
the current version of the HIPAA 837I.
“Required when Rendering Provider is different than the Attending Provider reported in
the 2310A loop of this claim.
AND
State or federal regulatory requirements call for a “combined claim,” that is, a claim
that includes both facility and professional components (for example, a Medicaid clinic
bill or Critical Access Hospital Claim.)
AND
The Rendering Provider for this line is different than the Rendering Provider reported in
Loop ID 2310D (claim level).
If not required by this implementation guide, do not send.
For information on the enrollment policy rules and how to reassign your benefits see
IOM 100-08, Chapter 10.
For all these examples assume the NPI for the Professional service provider is
1111111111.
Example 1 – The Professional service revenue code provider has reassigned benefits to
the CAH and is the claim level attending.
In this example if the professional service revenue code provider has not reassigned their
benefits in PECOS with an effective date that is prior to the from date on the claim, the
claim will receive reason code 31007.
Revenue Code Line Level
Rendering Provider
NPI in paper FL 43
or electronic Loop
2420C
Claim level
Attending Provider
NPI in paper FL 76
or electronic Loop
2310A
Claim level
Rendering Provider
NPI in paper FL
78-79 or electronic
Loop 2310D
1111111111
096x
Example 2 – The Professional service revenue code provider has reassigned benefits to
the CAH but is not the claim level attending but is the claim level rendering provider.
In this example if the professional service revenue code provider has not reassigned their
benefits in PECOS with an effective date that is prior to the from date on the claim, the
claim will receive reason code 31006.
Revenue Code Line Level
Rendering Provider
NPI in paper FL 43
or electronic Loop
2420C
Claim level
Attending Provider
NPI in paper FL 76
or electronic Loop
2310A
Claim level
Rendering Provider
NPI in paper FL
78-79 or electronic
Loop 2310D
2222222222 1111111111
096x
Example 3 – Professional has reassigned benefits to the CAH but is not the claim level
attending or rendering provider.
In this example if the professional service revenue code provider has not reassigned their
benefits in PECOS with an effective date that is prior to the from date on the claim, the
claim will receive reason code 31006.
Revenue Code Line Level
Rendering Provider
NPI in paper FL 43
or electronic Loop
2420C
Claim level
Attending Provider
NPI in paper FL 76
or electronic Loop
2310A
Claim level
Rendering Provider
NPI in paper FL
78-79 or electronic
Loop 2310D
2222222222 3333333333
096x 1111111111
History
(Rev. 13799; Issued: 05-28-2026; Effective: 06-29-2026; Implementation: 06-29-2026)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
7f5697e29ab26fc05c498c7bc12e749bd23347a8b60b3d178cb1bb87f91d1b83
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.