US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 3, § 190.7.2
Outlier Policy
§124 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP, Balance Budget Refinement Act of 1999
(BBRA) (Pub.L.106-113), mandated the development of a per diem prospective payment
system for inpatient psychiatric services furnished in hospitals and psychiatric distinct part
units of acute care hospitals. §405 (g)(2) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement,
and Modernization Act of 2003(MMA) (Pub. L. 108-173) extended the IPF PPS to distinct
part psychiatric units of critical access hospitals (CAHs). §124 of the BBRA provides the
Secretary discretion in establishing the payment methodology including payments for
cases incurring extraordinarily high costs. This additional payment known as an “outlier”
is designed to protect IPFs from large financial losses due to unusually expensive cases. If
the estimated cost of the case is greater than the adjusted fixed dollar loss threshold
amount (the fixed dollar loss threshold amount multiplied by area wage index, rural
location, teaching and COLA adjustment factors), an additional payment is added to the
IPF PPS payment amount.
The fixed dollar loss threshold amount is computed so that projected outlier payments
equal 2 percent of total IPF PPS payments to ensure that IPFs treating unusually costly
cases do not incur substantial losses and promote access to IPFs for patients who require
expensive care. The fixed dollar loss threshold amount is published in the annual IPF PPS
update notice or final rule. The specific regulations governing payments for outlier cases
are located at 42 CFR 412.424(d) (3) (i).
Under 42 CFR §412.424 (d)(3)(i), for discharges in cost reporting periods beginning on or
after January 1, 2005, high cost outlier payments may be reconciled at cost report
settlement to account for differences between the cost-to-charge ratio (CCR) used to pay
the claim at its original submission by the provider, and the CCR determined at final
settlement of the cost reporting period during which the discharge occurred. Medicare
contractors will use either the most recent settled IPF cost report or the most recent
tentatively settled IPF cost report, whichever is later, to obtain the applicable IPF CCR.
In addition, under 42 CFR § 412.424 (d)(3)(i),effective for discharges in cost reporting
periods beginning on or after January 1, 2005, at the time of reconciliation, outlier
payments may be adjusted to account for the time value of any underpayments or
overpayments based on the regulations in 42 CFR §412.84 (m), except that CMS
calculates a single overall (combined operating and capital ) CCR for IPFs and national
average IPF CCRs are used instead of statewide average CCRs.
Once the threshold amount is met, CMS will share a declining percentage of the losses for
a high cost case. The risk-sharing percentages would be 80 percent of the difference
between the cost for the case minus payment and the adjusted threshold amount for days 1
through 9 of the stay and 60 percent of the difference after the 9th day. Medicare
contractors will determine the total outlier amount and divide by the number of days, then
pay 80 percent for days 1-9 and 60 percent for days beyond that.
Outlier payments are not paid on interim bills, but they are calculated on a final discharge
bill, a benefits exhaust bill, or if the patient falls below a covered level of care. For a more
detailed explanation on the calculation of outlier payments, visit our Web site at
http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-
Payment/InpatientPsychFacilPPS/index.html?redirect=/inpatientpsychfacilpps
Medicare contractors may choose to review outliers if data analysis deems it a priority.
The Pricer program makes all outlier determinations except for the medical review
determinations.
History
(Rev. 2111, Issued: 12-03-10, Effective: 04-01-11, Implementation: 04-04-11)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
acd28e48d5165ad6760209da7bef006bfce21ebc30f5a413c35948aa8234b0c2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.