US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 3, § 150.10
Facility-Level Adjustments
Facility-level adjustments are based on individual LTCH characteristics. The BIPA
confers broad authority on the Secretary to include "appropriate adjustments to the long-term hospital payment system."
Variables examined include an area wage adjustment, adjustment for geographic
reclassification, disproportionate share patient (DSH) percentage, and an adjustment for
indirect medical education (IME).
• The system includes an area wage adjustment that is being phased in over 5 years.
• The wage adjustment is made by multiplying the labor-related share of the
standard Federal rate by the applicable wage index value.
• A LTCH's wage index is based on the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or rural
area in which the hospital is physically located, without regard to geographic
reclassification under http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title18/1886.htm
§§1886(d)(8) - (10) of the Act. Effective July 1, 2005, an LTCH wage index is
based on the Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSA).
• The phase-in of the wage index adjustment is as follows:
Cost Reporting
Periods Beginning
During
Applicable Wage Index Value
FY 2003 1/5th of the value of the
applicable pre-reclassification,
no floor hospital inpatient wage
index
FY 2004 2/5ths of the value of the
applicable pre-reclassification,
no floor hospital inpatient wage
index
FY 2005 3/5ths of the value of the
applicable pre-reclassification,
no floor hospital inpatient wage
index
FY 2006 4/5ths of the value of the
applicable pre-reclassification,
no floor hospital inpatient wage
index
FY 2007 Full value (5/5ths) of the value
of the applicable pre-reclassification, no floor
hospital inpatient wage index
Based on analyses of patient charge data from FYs 2000 and 2001 MedPAR data and cost
report data from FY 1998 and 1999 HCRIS data, there is no empirical evidence to support
other adjustments. Therefore, for the present, there are no adjustments for DSH, IME, or
geographic reclassification.
There is a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for LTCHs located in Alaska and Hawaii.
• The adjustment is made by multiplying the nonlabor-related portion of the
unadjusted standard Federal rate by the applicable COLA factor from OPM based
on the county that the LTCH is located (similar to the COLA under the acute care
hospital inpatient PPS).
• Annual updates for the LTCH PPS appear in Federal Register publications: for
payment rates and associated adjustments, see the LTCH PPS final rule with an
effective date of July 1. Annual updates of the LTC-DRGs are published in the
IPPS final rule with an effective date of October 1.
• The COLA factors effective July 1, 2004 are the same as under the acute care
hospital inpatient PPS and are as follows:
Area COLA
Alaska:
All Areas 1.25
Hawaii:
Honolulu 1.25
Hawaii County 1.165
Kauai County 1.2325
Maui County 1.2375
Kalawao County 1.2375
Cost-of-Living Adjustment Factors: Alaska and Hawaii Hospitals Area Cost of
Living Adjustment Factor effective for discharges on and after October 1, 2008.
Alaska:
City of Anchorage and 80-kilometer (50-mile) radius by road 1.24
City of Fairbanks and 80-kilometer (50-mile) radius by road 1.24
City of Juneau and 80-kilometer (50-mile) radius by road 1.24
Rest of Alaska 1.25
Hawaii:
City and County of Honolulu 1.25
County of Hawaii 1.17
County of Kauai 1.25
County of Maui and County of Kalawao 1.25
History
(Rev. 1547, Issued: 07-03-08; Effective: 07-01-08; Implementation: 07-07-08)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
385d28c082531fd8204c24584f7d0490d7051c95420019dbbcb7e32aa447ca15
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.