Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 3, § 140.1.7

Change of Ownership or Leasing

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

If an IRF hospital (or a hospital that has an IRF unit) undergoes a change of ownership or

leasing, as defined in 42 CFR §489.18, the IRF hospital (or IRF unit of a hospital) retains

its excluded status and will continue to be paid under the IRF PPS before and after the

change of ownership or leasing if the new owner(s) of the IRF hospital (or the hospital

with an IRF unit) accept assignment of the previous owners’ Medicare provider agreement

and the IRF continues to meet all of the requirements for payment under the IRF PPS.

Note that an IRF’s payment status under the IRF PPS is a Medicare classification status,

which cannot be separated from its host hospital and therefore cannot be purchased

outside of the purchase of its host hospital.

If the new owner(s) do not accept assignment of the previous owners’ Medicare provider

agreement, the IRF is considered to be voluntarily terminated and the new owner(s) may

re-apply to the Medicare program to operate a new IRF, under the requirements for new

IRFs in §140.1.4 above.

If, after the change of ownership or leasing, the IRF does not continue to meet all of the

requirements for payment under the IRF PPS, then the IRF loses its excluded status and

will be paid instead under the IPPS.

History

(Rev. 2673, Issued: 03-14-13, Effective: 04-22-13, Implementation: 04-22-13)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
11e5394d5d8ce082c424f69a579a11872c9f134cdb4a5f80e1aa5f5d05d0776f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.