US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 3, § 140.1.1
Criteria That Must Be Met By Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities
An inpatient rehabilitation hospital or an inpatient rehabilitation unit of a hospital (otherwise
referred to as an IRF) is excluded from the IPPS and is eligible for payment under the IRF
PPS if it meets all of the criteria listed below. Note that in order for an individual IRF claim
to receive Medicare payment under the IRF PPS, it must meet all of the IRF coverage
requirements in 42 CFR 412.622(a)(3), (4), and (5), as further clarified in Chapter 1, Section
110 of the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual (Pub. 100-02.
A. - The IRF must have (or be part of a hospital that has) a provider agreement under 42 CFR
Part 489 to participate in Medicare as a hospital.
B. - During the most recent, consecutive, and appropriate 12-month time period (as
defined by CMS or the A/B MAC (A)) the IRF must have treated an inpatient population
that met or exceeded the following percentages:
1. For cost reporting periods beginning on or after July 1, 2004, and before July 1, 2005,
the hospital must have served an inpatient population of whom at least 50 percent
required intensive rehabilitative services for treatment of one or more of the medical
conditions specified below at § 140.1.1C.
2. For cost reporting periods beginning on or after July 1, 2005, the IRF must have
served an inpatient population of whom at least 60 percent required intensive
rehabilitative services for treatment of one or more of the medical conditions specified
below at § 140.1.1C.
C. - List of Medical Conditions:
1. Stroke.
2. Spinal cord injury.
3. Congenital deformity.
4. Amputation.
5. Major multiple trauma.
6. Fracture of femur (hip fracture).
7. Brain injury.
8. Neurological disorders, including multiple sclerosis, motor neuron diseases,
polyneuropathy, muscular dystrophy, and Parkinson’s disease.
9. Burns.
10. Active, polyarticular rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and seronegative
arthropathies resulting in significant functional impairment of ambulation and other
activities of daily living that have not improved after an appropriate, aggressive, and
sustained course (as defined below) of outpatient therapy services or services in other
less intensive rehabilitation settings, but have the potential to improve with more
intensive rehabilitation.
11. Systemic vasculidites with joint inflammation, resulting in significant functional
impairment of ambulation and other activities of daily living that have not improved
after an appropriate, aggressive, and sustained course (as defined below) of outpatient
therapy services or services in other less intensive rehabilitation settings, but would have
the potential to improve with more intensive rehabilitation.
12. Severe or advanced osteoarthritis (osteoarthrosis or degenerative joint disease)
involving two or more major weight bearing joints (elbow, shoulders, hips, or knees, but
not counting a joint with a prosthesis) with joint deformity and substantial loss of range
of motion, atrophy of muscles surrounding the joint, significant functional impairment
of ambulation and other activities of daily living that have not improved after the patient
has participated in an appropriate, aggressive, and sustained course (as defined below) of
outpatient therapy services or services in other less intensive rehabilitation settings, but
would have the potential to improve with more intensive rehabilitation. (A joint
replaced by a prosthesis no longer is considered to have osteoarthritis, or other arthritis,
even though this condition was the reason for the joint replacement.)
13. Knee or hip joint replacement, or both, during a hospitalization immediately
preceding the IRF stay and also meets one or more of the following specific criteria:
a. The patient underwent bilateral knee or bilateral hip joint replacement surgery
during the hospital admission immediately preceding the IRF admission.
b. The patient is extremely obese with a Body Mass Index of at least 50 at the time
of admission to the IRF.
c. The patient is age 85 or older at the time of admission to the IRF.
Definition of “an appropriate, aggressive, and sustained course of outpatient therapy services
or services in other less intensive rehabilitation settings”
For the medical conditions specified above in subsections 10, 11, and 12, an appropriate,
aggressive, and sustained course of outpatient therapy services or services in other less
intensive rehabilitation settings must consist of a course of rehabilitation therapy of at least 3
weeks minimum duration with at least two individual (non-group) therapy sessions per week
targeting all clinically impaired joints supported by documentation in the medical record of all
such services with periodic assessments for clinical functional improvement, within 20
calendar days of an acute hospitalization preceding immediately an IRF stay, or 20 calendar
days immediately preceding an IRF admission. However, there may be cases when, in the
A/B MAC (A)’s judgment, the preceding interpretation of what is considered an appropriate,
aggressive, and sustained course of outpatient therapy services or services in other less
intensive rehabilitation settings should not be used. In these cases, the A/B MAC (A) has the
discretion to develop, document, and use another interpretation, which is based upon local
practices and more current clinical information, that interprets or defines what the A/B MAC
(A) considers is an appropriate, aggressive, and sustained course of outpatient therapy
services or services in other less intensive rehabilitation settings. Regardless of which
interpretation or definition is used by the A/B MAC (A) with respect to what is considered an
appropriate, aggressive, and sustained course of outpatient therapy services or services in
other less intensive rehabilitation settings, the course of therapy itself should have the goal of
completing the rehabilitation, not preparing a patient for surgery. The outpatient therapy
services (or services in other less intensive settings) must immediately precede the IRF
admission or result from a systemic disease activation immediately before admission.
The A/B MAC (A) has the discretion to review documentation to assure that the patient has
completed an appropriate, aggressive, and sustained course of therapy or services in less
intensive rehabilitation settings. CMS expects that the IRF will obtain copies of the therapy
notes from the outpatient therapy or from the therapy services provided in another less
intensive setting and include these in the patient’s medical record at the IRF (in a section
for prior records). CMS believes that these prior records will be used by therapists and
others caring for the patient in the IRF, and will also be available to the A/B MAC (A) staff
who review the medical records for compliance with the requirements specified above in
§140.1.1B-D.
D. - Comorbidities.—A comorbidity is a specific patient condition that is secondary to the
patient’s principal diagnosis. A patient with a comorbidity may be counted as part of the
inpatient population that counts towards the required applicable percentage specified above in
§140.1.1B-D if:
1. The patient is admitted for inpatient rehabilitation for a medical condition that is not
one of the conditions specified above in sub-section 140.1.1C.
2. The patient has a comorbidity that falls in one of the medical conditions specified above
in sub-section 140.1.1C; and
3. The comorbidity has caused significant decline in functional ability in the individual
such that, even in the absence of the admitting condition, the individual would require the
intensive rehabilitation treatment that is unique to inpatient rehabilitation facilities paid
under the IRF PPS.
E. - For the first cost reporting period during which a facility first begins being paid under the
IRF PPS as a “new” IRF, a facility seeking to be paid under the IRF PPS must provide a
written certification to the A/B MAC (A) that the inpatient population it intends to serve
meets the requirements specified above in §140.1.1B-D. However, if CMS discovers that the
facility did not actually meet the requirements specified above in §140.1.1B-D during any
cost reporting period for which the facility provided such written certification of its intent to
meet the requirements in §140.1.1B-D, then CMS will adjust the payments associated with
that cost reporting period as described below in §140.1.9.
F. - The IRF has in effect a preadmission screening procedure under which each
prospective patient's condition and medical history are reviewed to determine whether the
patient is likely to benefit significantly from an intensive inpatient hospital rehabilitation
program. This procedure must ensure that the preadmission screening is reviewed and
approved by a rehabilitation physician prior to the patient’s admission to the IRF.
G. - The IRF has in effect a procedure to ensure that patients receive close medical
supervision, as evidenced by at least 3 face-to-face visits per week by a licensed physician
with specialized training and experience in inpatient rehabilitation to assess the patient both
medically and functionally, as well as to modify the course of treatment as needed to
maximize the patient’s capacity to benefit from the rehabilitation process. Beginning with
the second week of admission to the IRF, a non-physician practitioner who is determined by
the IRF to have specialized training and experience in inpatient rehabilitation may conduct 1
of the 3 required face-to-face visits with the patient per week, provided that such duties are
within the non-physician practitioner’s scope of practice under applicable state law.
H. - The IRF furnishes, through the use of qualified personnel, rehabilitation nursing,
physical therapy, and occupational therapy, plus, as needed, speech-language pathology,
social services, psychological services (including neuropsychological services), and
orthotic and prosthetic services.
I. - The IRF has one physician who serves as director of rehabilitation and who—
(1) Provides services to the IRF hospital or its inpatients on a full-time basis or, in the case
of a rehabilitation unit, at least 20 hours per week;
(2) Is a doctor of medicine or osteopathy;
(3) Is licensed under State law to practice medicine or surgery; and
(4) Has had, after completing a one-year hospital internship, at least 2 years of training or
experience in the medical management of inpatients requiring rehabilitation services.
If an IRF serves both inpatients and outpatients, the time spent by the director in performing
administrative duties for the entire facility counts toward the direction requirement since it is
not feasible to prorate this administrative time between inpatients and outpatients. However,
any time spent in furnishing direct patient care can count toward the direction requirement
only if the care is furnished to inpatients.
J. - The IRF has a plan of treatment for each inpatient that is established, reviewed, and
revised, as needed, by a physician in consultation with other professional personnel who
provide services to the patient.
K. - The IRF uses a coordinated interdisciplinary team approach in the rehabilitation of each
inpatient, as documented by periodic clinical entries made in the patient's medical record to
note the patient's status in relationship to goal attainment and discharge plans. The IRF must
also ensure that team conferences are held at least once per week to determine the
appropriateness of treatment.
History
(Rev. 12575; Issued:04-11-24; Effective: 07-12-24; Implementation: 07-12-24)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
f6fcb9387722ebc733be272a67de48fdc1aba756fdecb762f826d1b10d328121
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.