US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 3, § 140
Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System (IRF
PPS)
(Rev. 2673, Issued: 03-14-13, Effective: 04-22-13, Implementation: 04-22-13)
Section 1886(j) of the Social Security Act (the Act) authorizes the implementation of a per
discharge prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient rehabilitation hospitals and
inpatient rehabilitation units of a hospital now jointly referred to as inpatient rehabilitation
facilities (IRFs).
The IRF PPS is effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2002.
IRF PPS payment rates include all costs of furnishing covered IRF services (routine,
ancillary, and capital-related costs) other than costs associated with operating approved
educational activities as defined in
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR, select the
applicable year. Then select Title 42, Chapter IV. Select the TOC for Section 413 and
choose §413.75 and §413.85 for educational activities. You may also search the TOC for
bad debts, and other costs not covered under the PPS.
Effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2004, the Medicare
Modernization Act of 2003, Public Law 108-173, section 405(g) established that CAHs may
open rehabilitation distinct part units. These IRFs will also be paid under the IRF PPS.
History
(Rev. 2673, Issued: 03-14-13, Effective: 04-22-13, Implementation: 04-22-13)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
25864f47661a51abf8181a4f5b3897881fc6642c717e085d0b4ec0b6b5a32349
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.