US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 1, § 80.3.1
Incomplete or Invalid Claims Processing Terminology
The following definitions apply to §80.3.2. For carriers the requirements apply to Part B
assigned and unassigned claims (Form CMS-1500) or electronic data interchange
equivalent.
Unprocessable Claim - Any claim with incomplete or missing, required information, or
any claim that contains complete and necessary information; however, the information
provided is invalid. Such information may either be required for all claims or required
conditionally.
Incomplete Information - Missing, required or conditional information on a claim (e.g.,
no Unique Physician Identification Number (UPIN) / Provider Identification Number
(PIN) or National Provider Identifier (NPI) when effective).
Invalid Information - Complete required or conditional information on a claim that is
illogical, or incorrect (e.g., incorrect UPIN/PIN or NPI when effective), or no longer in
effect (e.g., an expired number).
Required - Any data element that is needed in order to process a claim (e.g., Provider
Name, Date of Service).
Not Required - Any data element that is optional or is not needed by Medicare in order to
process a claim (e.g., Patient’s Marital Status).
Conditional - Any data element that must be completed if other conditions exist (e.g., if
there is insurance primary to Medicare, then the primary insurer’s group name and
number must be entered on a claim or if the insured is different from the patient, then the
insured’s name must be entered on a claim).
Return as Unprocessable or Return to Provider (RTP)- Returning a claim as
unprocessable to the provider (RTP) does not mean that the carrier or FI should
physically return every claim it received with incomplete or invalid information. The
term “return to provider” is used to refer to the many processes utilized today for
notifying the provider or supplier of service that their claim cannot be processed, and that
it must be corrected or resubmitted. Some (not all) of the various techniques for
returning claims as unprocessable include:
• Incomplete or invalid information is detected at the front-end of the carrier or FI
claims processing system. The claim is returned to the provider (RTP’d) either
electronically or in a hardcopy/checklist type form explaining the error(s) and
how to correct the errors prior to resubmission. Claim data are not retained in the
system for these RTP'd claims. No RA is issued.
• Incomplete or invalid information is detected at the front-end of the claims
processing system and is suspended and developed. If requested corrections
and/or medical documentation are submitted within a 45-day period, the claim is
processed. Otherwise, the suspended portion is returned and the supplier or
provider of service is notified by means of the RA.
• Incomplete or invalid information is detected within the claims processing
system and is rejected through the remittance process. Suppliers or providers of
service are notified of any error(s) through the remittance notice and how to
correct prior to resubmission. A record of the claim is retained in the system
(NOTE: This applies to carriers only. FIs do not use the remittance advice
process for return to provider (RTP)).
A claim returned as unprocessable for incomplete or invalid information does not meet
the criteria to be considered as a claim, is not denied, and, as such, is not afforded appeal
rights.
History
(Rev. 1588; Issued: 09-05-08; Effective/Implementation Date: 08-18-08)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
767653e0ec798f2573bbde716fd26d6a5bbb9842e7f831c2a584a7ce70f26b9a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.