US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 1, § 70.8.2
Replicating Claims for Processing
There are no prescribed reasons other than those aforementioned for splitting claims and
for counting additional claims into your workload. However, claims are frequently split
for other reasons that are dictated by the systems or the methods of processing them.
Such additional claims are labeled "Replicate Claims." Tally and report all replicate
claims (other than those aforementioned) separately. Identify replicate claims and report
them in the appropriate categories for claims. Some examples of replicate claims are:
• Additional claims created because of a line item limitation (regardless of the
methodology used for coding line items);
• Extra claims created in making partial payments;
• Claims created for carving out individual specialty types of services and
• Extra claims created to apply special payment reductions (e.g., Gramm-Rudmann-Hollings) efficiently for applicable dates of service.
NOTE: For budget requests and cost reports (CMS-l524, CMS-l528, CMS-l6l6, and
CMS-2599), the workload must exclude the number of replicate claims
produced.
History
(Rev. 170, 05-07-04)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
9c47df6b5f076db717f0d28396aafccb3c7a7741c770055de0b3893d23385fa3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.