US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 1, § 70.4
Determination of Untimely Filing and Resulting Actions
Medicare denies a claim for untimely filing if the receipt date applied to the claim
exceeds 12 months or 1 calendar year from the date the services were furnished (i.e.,
generally, the “From” date, with the exception of the “Through” date for institutional
claims that have span dates of services, as specified in §70.1). When a claim is denied for
having been filed after the timely filing period, such denial does not constitute an “initial
determination”. As such, the determination that a claim was not filed timely is not
subject to appeal.
Where the beneficiary request for payment was filed timely (or would have been filed
timely had the provider taken action to obtain a request from the patient whom the
provider knew or had reason to believe might be a beneficiary) but the provider is
responsible for not filing a timely claim, the provider may not charge the beneficiary for
the services except for such deductible and/or coinsurance amounts as would have been
appropriate if Medicare payment had been made. In appropriate cases, such claims should
be processed because of the spell-of-illness implications and/or in order to record the
days, visits, cash and blood deductibles. The beneficiary is charged utilization days, if
applicable for the type of services received.
History
(Rev. 12909; Issued: 10-24-24; Effective: 11-26-24; Implementation: 11-26-24)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
21120693837fc1b5eb867c189397ea827ee834c4f477626a2df73e532eee5012
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.