US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 1, § 30.3.13
Charges for Missed Appointments
Charges for Missed Appointments
(Rev. 3510, Issued: 04-29-16, Effective: 10-01-16, Implementation; 10-03-16)
CMS's policy is to allow physicians and suppliers to charge Medicare beneficiaries for
missed appointments, provided that they do not discriminate against Medicare
beneficiaries but also charge non-Medicare patients for missed appointments. The charge
for a missed appointment is not a charge for a service itself (to which the assignment and
limiting charge provisions apply), but rather is a charge for a missed business
opportunity. Therefore, if a physician's or supplier's missed appointment policy applies
equally to all patients (Medicare and non-Medicare), then the Medicare law and
regulations do not preclude the physician or supplier from charging the Medicare patient
directly.
The amount that the physician or supplier charges for the missed appointment must apply
equally to all patients (Medicare and non-Medicare), in other words, the amount the
physician/supplier charges Medicare beneficiaries for missed appointments must be the
same as the amount that they charge non-Medicare patients (whatever amount that may
be).
With respect to Part A providers, in most instances a hospital outpatient department can
charge a beneficiary a missed appointment charge without violating its provider
agreement and 42 CFR 489.22. Because 42 CFR 489.22 applies only to inpatient
services, it does not restrict a hospital outpatient department from imposing charges for
missed appointments by outpatients. In the event, however, that a hospital inpatient
misses an appointment in the hospital outpatient department, it would violate 42 CFR
489.22 for the outpatient department to charge the beneficiary a missed appointment fee.
Medicare does not make any payments for missed appointment fees/charges that are
imposed by providers, physicians, or other suppliers. Charges to beneficiaries for missed
appointments should not be billed to Medicare.
The contractor shall use the following remittance advice messages and associated codes
when rejecting/denying claims under this policy. This CARC/RARC combination is
compliant with CAQH CORE Business Scenario Three.
Group Code: PR
CARC: 204
RARC: N/A
MSN: 16.59
History
(Rev. 3510, Issued: 04-29-16, Effective: 10-01-16, Implementation; 10-03-16)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
d9c8cd88d01c7e269d8858dec9e5085b73a2f35b5d3d25efb8458cab0bcc1dd3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.